Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397072›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Significance of nested PCR testing for the detection of low-density malaria infection amongst febrile patients from the Malaria Elimination Demonstration Project in Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Akansha Singh, Mrigendra P Singh, Sneha Bhandari, Harsh Rajvanshi, Sekh Nisar, Vinay Telasey, Himanshu Jayswar, Ashok K Mishra, Aparup Das, Harpreet Kaur and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Akansha SinghIndian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (ICMR-NIRTH), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Mrigendra P SinghMalaria Elimination Demonstration Project, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sneha BhandariIndian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Research in Environment Health (ICMR-NIREH), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Harsh RajvanshiMalaria Elimination Demonstration Project, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sekh NisarMalaria Elimination Demonstration Project, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Vinay TelaseyMalaria Elimination Demonstration Project, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Himanshu JayswarDirectorate of Health Services, Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, India.
Ashok K MishraIndian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (ICMR-NIRTH), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Aparup DasIndian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Research in Tribal Health (ICMR-NIRTH), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Harpreet KaurDepartment of Health Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India.
Altaf A LalMalaria Elimination Demonstration Project, Mandla, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Praveen K BhartiIndian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Malaria Research (ICMR-NIMR), New Delhi, India. saprapbs@yahoo.co.in.
Indian Council of Medical Research · INGovernment of Uttar Pradesh · INNational Institute for Research in Tribal Health · INNational Institute of Malaria Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-density malaria infections (LDMI) are defined as infections that are missed by the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and/or microscopy which can lead to continued transmission and poses a challenge in malaria elimination efforts. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of LDMI in febrile cases using species-specific nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests in the Malaria Elimination Demonstration Project, where routine diagnosis was conducted using RDT.

methodsEvery 10th fever case from a cross-sectional community based fever surveillance was tested with RDT, microscopy and nested PCR. Parasite DNA was isolated from the filter paper using Chelex based method. Molecular diagnosis by nested PCR was performed targeting 18SrRNA gene for Plasmodium species.

resultsThe prevalence of malaria was 2.50% (436/17405) diagnosed by PCR, 1.13% (196/17405) by RDT, and 0.68% (118/ 17,405) by microscopy. Amongst 17,405 febrile samples, the prevalence of LDMI was 1.51% (263/17405) (95% CI 1.33-1.70), which were missed by conventional methods. Logistic regression analysis revealed that illness during summer season [OR = 1.90 (p < 0.05)] and cases screened within three days of febrile illness [OR = 5.27 (p < 0.001)] were the statistically significant predictors of LDMI.

conclusionThe prevalence of malaria among febrile cases using PCR was 2.50% (436/17405) as compared to 1.13% (196/17405) by RDT. Higher number of the LDMI cases were found in subjects with ≤ 3 days mean duration of reported fever, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). This observation suggests that an early detection of malaria with a more sensitive diagnostic method or repeat testing of the all negative cases may be useful for curtailing malaria transmission. Therefore, malaria elimination programme would benefit from using more sensitive and specific diagnostic methods, such as PCR.

Indexed as

MalariaPlasmodium falciparumCross-Sectional StudiesFeverHumansIndiaPolymerase Chain ReactionLow-density infectionMalariaPCRP. falciparumP. vivax

Identifiers

PMID36397072
PMCPMC9669540
OpenAlexW4309467502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.