Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397056›Full record

ReviewBMC medical education2022

Self-assessment scale for the community-based and emergency practice.

Takao Wakabayashi, Yoshihisa Tsuji, Takeshi Yamamoto, Hitoshi Sohma, Wari Yamamoto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takao WakabayashiDepartment of General and Emergency Medicine, Japan Community Health-care Organization Sapporo Hokushin Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshihisa TsujiDepartment of General Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, S1 W17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan. ytsuji@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Takeshi YamamotoDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, S1 W17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan.
Hitoshi SohmaCenter for Medical Education, Sapporo Medical University, S1 W17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan.
Wari YamamotoDepartment of General Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, S1 W17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor current medical education, community-based primary care for the elderly is an essential topic. This study aimed to establish a scale of community-based assessment for clinical and emergency practice (C-CEP).

methodsA self-assessment scale for C-CEP was developed according to four steps. Initially, we reviewed publications from the societies of the United States, British, and Japan regarding educational goals. In addition, we searched MEDLINE for educational goals regarding attitude, skills, and knowledge. Getting together, we established 23 items as the educational goals of the C-CEP. Second, we collected responses for these 23 items from 5th-grade medical students (n = 195). Third, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using their responses to determine the fundamental structure of the self-assessment scale. Finally, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to assess the fitness of the self-assessment scale developing the EFA, resulting in modification of the items.

resultsIn EFA and CFA results, C-CEP Scale consisted of four factors with 15 items: "Attitude and communication in emergency care," Basic clinical skills," "Knowledge of community healthcare," and "Knowledge of evidence-based medicine perseverance." The model fit indices were acceptable (Goodness of Fix Index = 0.928, Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index = 0.900, Comparative Fit Index = 0.979, and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.045). The values of McDonald's omega as an estimate of scale reliability were more than 0.7 in all four factors. As for test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were ≥ 0.58 for all factors. All four factors of the C-CEP Scale correlated positively with the Medical Professionalism Evaluation Scale subscales.

conclusionsWe developed a valid and reliable self-assessment scale to assess student competence.

Indexed as

Self-AssessmentStudentsAgedFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsClinical clerkshipCommunity-basedEmergency practicePrimary-careSelf-assessment

Identifiers

PMID36397056
PMCPMC9670040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.