Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397009›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Quality of residential facilities in Italy: satisfaction and quality of life of residents with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Alessandra Martinelli, Helen Killaspy, Cristina Zarbo, Sara Agosta, Letizia Casiraghi, Manuel Zamparini, Fabrizio Starace, Matteo Rocchetti, Giovanni de Girolamo, Mirella Ruggeri and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessandra MartinelliSection of Psychiatry, Verona Hospital Trust, AOUI, Verona, Italy. amartinelli@fatebenefratelli.eu.
Helen KillaspyDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Cristina ZarboUnit of Epidemiological and Evaluation Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Sara AgostaMental Health and Dependence, AUSL of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Letizia CasiraghiDepartment of Mental Health and Dependence, ASST of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Manuel ZampariniUnit of Epidemiological and Evaluation Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Fabrizio StaraceMental Health and Dependence, AUSL of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Matteo RocchettiDepartment of Mental Health and Dependence, ASST of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Giovanni de GirolamoUnit of Epidemiological and Evaluation Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Mirella RuggeriSection of Psychiatry, Verona Hospital Trust, AOUI, Verona, Italy.
DIAPASON consortium
Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecovery and human rights promotion for people with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSDs) is fundamental to provide good care in Residential Facilities (RFs). However, there is a concern about rehabilitation ethos in RFs. This study aimed to investigate the care quality of Italian RFs, the quality of life (QoL) and care experience of residents with SSD.

methodsFourty-eight RFs were assessed using a quality assessment tool (QuIRC-SA) and 161 residents with SSD were enrolled. Seventeen RFs provided high intensity rehabilitation (SRP1), 15 medium intensity (SRP2), and 16 medium-low level support (SRP3). Staff-rated tools measured psychiatric symptoms and psychosocial functioning; user-rated tools assessed QoL and satisfaction with services. RFs comparisons were made using ANOVA and Chi-squared.

resultsOver two-thirds patients (41.5 y.o., SD 9.7) were male. Seventy-six were recruited from SRP1 services, 48 from SRP2, and 27 from SRP3. The lowest QuIRC-SA scoring was Recovery Based Practice (45.8%), and the highest was promotion of Human Rights (58.4%). SRP2 had the lowest QuIRC-SA ratings and SRP3 the highest. Residents had similar psychopathology (p = 0.140) and functioning (p = 0.537). SRP3 residents were more employed (18.9%) than SRP1 (7.9%) or SRP2 (2.2%) ones, and had less severe negative symptoms (p = 0.016) and better QoL (p = 0.020) than SRP2 residents. There were no differences in the RF therapeutic milieu and their satisfaction with care.

conclusionsResidents of the lowest supported RFs in Italy had less severe negative symptoms, better QoL and more employment than others. The lowest ratings for Recovery Based Practice across all RFs suggest more work is needed to improve recovery.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionSchizophreniaFemaleHumansItalyMaleQuality of LifeResidential FacilitiesFunctioningQuality of careQuality of lifeRecoveryResidential facilitiesSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID36397009
PMCPMC9672559
OpenAlexW4309263575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.