Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397003›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Enhancing the role of the social network in activity (re)engagement post-stroke: a focus group study with rehabilitation professionals.

Dinja J van der Veen, Sandra Jellema, Philip J van der Wees, Maud J L Graff, Bert J M de Swart, Esther M J Steultjens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dinja J van der VeenRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Dinja.vanderVeen@radboudumc.nl.
Sandra JellemaHAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Philip J van der WeesRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maud J L GraffRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bert J M de SwartHAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Esther M J SteultjensHAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLHAN University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople post-stroke are at risk of not being able to participate in valued activities. It is important that rehabilitation professionals prepare people post-stroke for the transition home and provide needed support when they live at home. Several authors have suggested that members of the broad social network should play an active role in rehabilitation. This includes informing them about the importance of activity (re)engagement post-stroke and learning strategies to provide support. It is not clear when and how the broad social network can best be equipped to provide adequate activity support. This study aimed to explore stroke professionals' perspectives on strategies that establish a social network that supports activity (re)engagement of people post-stroke, when strategies are best implemented, and the factors that influence the implementation of these strategies.

methodsTwo focus groups were executed. Content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts of the recorded conversations.

resultsEighteen professionals with various professional backgrounds and roles in treating people post-stroke participated. Strategies to establish a supportive social network included identifying, expanding, informing, and actively engaging network members. Working with the network in the immediate post-stroke phase was regarded as important for improving long-term activity outcomes. Participants expressed that most strategies to equip the social network to support people post-stroke need to take place within community care. However, the participants experienced difficulties in implementing network strategies. Perceived barriers included interprofessional collaboration, professional knowledge, self-efficacy, and financial structures.

conclusionsStrategies to involve the social network of people post-stroke are not fully implemented. Although identifying members of a social network should begin during inpatient rehabilitation, the main part of actively engaging the network will have to take place when the people post-stroke return home. Implementing social network strategies requires a systematic process focusing on collaboration, knowledge, attitude, and skill development.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationFocus GroupsHumansSocial NetworkingImplementation StrategiesInformal CaregivingInterprofessional CollaborationRehabilitationSocial NetworkStrokeValued Activities

Identifiers

PMID36397003
PMCPMC9673324
OpenAlexW4309617730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.