Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36396939›Full record

ArticleCell death discovery2022

RACK1 is evolutionary conserved in satellite stem cell activation and adult skeletal muscle regeneration.

Elisabetta Catalani, Silvia Zecchini, Matteo Giovarelli, Agnese Cherubini, Simona Del Quondam, Kashi Brunetti, Federica Silvestri, Paulina Roux-Biejat, Alessandra Napoli, Silvia Rosanna Casati and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheiScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabetta Catalani *Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Silvia Zecchini *Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco" (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy.
Matteo Giovarelli *Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco" (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy.
Agnese CherubiniDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Simona Del QuondamDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Kashi BrunettiDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Federica SilvestriDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Paulina Roux-BiejatDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco" (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy.
Alessandra NapoliDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco" (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy.
Silvia Rosanna CasatiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine (BioMeTra), Università degli Studi di Milano, via L. Vanvitelli 32, 20129, Milano, Italy.
Marcello CeciDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Nicla RomanoDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0155-8271
Silvia BongiorniDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Giorgio PranteraDepartment of Ecological and Biological Sciences (DEB), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Emilio ClementiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco" (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy.
Cristiana PerrottaDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco" (DIBIC), Università degli Studi di Milano, via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6680-4536
Clara De PalmaDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine (BioMeTra), Università degli Studi di Milano, via L. Vanvitelli 32, 20129, Milano, Italy.
Davide CerviaDepartment for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), Università degli Studi della Tuscia, largo dell'Università snc, 01100, Viterbo, Italy. d.cervia@unitus.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-9449
Università degli Studi della Tuscia · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (Ministry of Education, University and Research) PRIN2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle growth and regeneration involves the activity of resident adult stem cells, namely satellite cells (SC). Despite numerous mechanisms have been described, different signals are emerging as relevant in SC homeostasis. Here we demonstrated that the Receptor for Activated C-Kinase 1 (RACK1) is important in SC function. RACK1 was expressed transiently in the skeletal muscle of post-natal mice, being abundant in the early phase of muscle growth and almost disappearing in adult mature fibers. The presence of RACK1 in interstitial SC was also detected. After acute injury in muscle of both mouse and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (used as alternative in vivo model) we found that RACK1 accumulated in regenerating fibers while it declined with the progression of repair process. To note, RACK1 also localized in the active SC that populate recovering tissue. The dynamics of RACK1 levels in isolated adult SC of mice, i.e., progressively high during differentiation and low compared to proliferating conditions, and RACK1 silencing indicated that RACK1 promotes both the formation of myotubes and the accretion of nascent myotubes. In Drosophila with depleted RACK1 in all muscle cells or, specifically, in SC lineage we observed a delayed recovery of skeletal muscle after physical damage as well as the low presence of active SC in the wound area. Our results also suggest the coupling of RACK1 to muscle unfolded protein response during SC activation. Collectively, we provided the first evidence that transient levels of the evolutionarily conserved factor RACK1 are critical for adult SC activation and proper skeletal muscle regeneration, favoring the efficient progression of SC from a committed to a fully differentiated state.

Identifiers

PMID36396939
PMCPMC9672362
OpenAlexW4309265046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.