Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36396856›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Fluorescent silica nanoparticles as an internal marker in fruit flies and their effects on survivorship and fertility.

Nut Songvorawit, Photchara Phengphuang, Thitinat Khongkhieo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nut SongvorawitBehavioural Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand. nut.so@chula.ac.th.
Photchara PhengphuangBehavioural Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Thitinat KhongkhieoBehavioural Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Chulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

Ratchadapiseksompotch Fund Chulalongkorn University CU_GR_62_61_23_24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracking and differentiating small insects at the individual levels requires appropriate marking materials because of their small size. This study proposes and investigates the use of fluorescent silica nanoparticles (FSNPs) as an internal marker owing to their good optical properties and biocompatibility. FSNPs were prepared using the water-in-oil reverse microemulsion technique with Rubpy dye as a fluorophore. The obtained particles were spherical, monodispersed in nanosize and exhibited bright orange luminescence under ultraviolet (UV) light. Internal marking was accomplished in fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) through feeding. The result shows that the fruit flies exhibit bright luminescence in their abdomen when exposed to UV light. The marking persistence duration of FSNPs in the fruit fly bodies is longer than those of other fluorescent dyes. Fruit flies fed with FSNPs have a longer lifespan than those fed with Rubpy dye. There was no difference in fertility and negative geotaxis response among the treatment and control groups. These findings demonstrate that FSNPs can be used as an internal marker in fruit flies, and are possibly applied with other small insects with a translucent abdomen.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesSilicon DioxideAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterFertilityFluorescent DyesSurvivorshipFluorescent DyesSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID36396856
PMCPMC9671903
OpenAlexW4309513587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.