ArticleJournal of nephrology2022
The ABCs of personalized incremental dialysis start, Le Mans style.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient monitoring in a pragmatic, multicenter trial of incremental hemodialysis: early experience from the TwoPlus randomized controlled trial.BMC nephrology · 2025Trial
- Reduced intensity incremental hemodialysis start does not decrease life expectancy and saves money: results of the RIDDLE study.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- 2023 European Kidney Forum: The future of kidney care - investing in green nephrology to meet the European Green Deal targets.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
- The 60:40 conundrum: are women with CKD discriminated after referral to a nephrology clinic?Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Sex and gender differences in health-related quality of life in individuals treated with incremental and conventional hemodialysis.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Article
- On the path to individualizing care with incremental-start hemodialysis.Journal of nephrology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD) is considered the standard of care for patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) on extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. However, recent evidence has shown that up to one third of patients start dialysis with a residual kidney function that could allow a reduced frequency/dialysis dose. Interest towards HD schedules other than thrice weekly and the lessons learned from peritoneal dialysis, in addition to growing attention to patients' quality of life, have promoted renewed attention towards incremental HD (iHD). iHD comprises once and twice weekly schedules, makes it possible to soften the "dialysis shock" at the inception of therapy and is patient-friendly. Moreover, it might contribute to preserving residual kidney function longer. Nevertheless, iHD is performed differently in different settings and no guidelines exist on this subject. Taking advantage of the experience accrued with regard to the treatment of advanced CKD both in the outpatient clinic and in the dialysis unit in Le Mans, where two thirds of incident HD patients start in an incremental way, we aimed to present the practical aspects of iHD and discuss its advantages and drawbacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36396845What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.