ArticleScientific reports2022
Correlation analysis of human upper arm parameters to oscillometric signal in automatic blood pressure measurement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex Differences in BP From an Automated Oscillometric Compared With Manual Device.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Article
- Arterial stiffness assessment using PPG feature extraction and significance testing in an in vitro cardiovascular system.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of blood pressure using a flexible and wearable capacitive pressure sensor.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Reproduction of human blood pressure waveform using physiology-based cardiovascular simulator.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Combining Gaussian Process with Hybrid Optimal Feature Decision in Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of global deaths, making cardiovascular health monitoring important. Measuring blood pressure using an automatic sphygmomanometer is the most widely used method to monitor cardiovascular health due to its accessibility, convenience, and strong correlation with cardiovascular diseases. In this work, in order to estimate brachial artery diameter, stiffness, or thickness using an automatic sphygmomanometer, the correlation between upper arm parameters and the oscillometric signal was intensively investigated through analytical, numerical, and experimental approaches. The parametric studies commonly revealed that the inner radius of the brachial artery is the most influential parameter in determining the amplitude of the oscillometric signal. The experimental results of using a cardiovascular simulator (a virtual patient) combined with upper arm phantoms with various inner radii of the brachial artery showed a 6.5% change in the oscillometric signal amplitude with a 10% artery radius variation. It was concluded that the oscillometric signal can be used to evaluate brachial artery diameter. Based on the clinical relationship between brachial artery diameter and cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity, this study showed and verified a novel method to monitor brachial artery diameter and hence, cardiovascular risks while measuring blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.