Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36396696›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Improving performance of deep learning models using 3.5D U-Net via majority voting for tooth segmentation on cone beam computed tomography.

Kang Hsu, Da-Yo Yuh, Shao-Chieh Lin, Pin-Sian Lyu, Guan-Xin Pan, Yi-Chun Zhuang, Chia-Ching Chang, Hsu-Hsia Peng, Tung-Yang Lee, Cheng-Hsuan Juan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Application of Deep Learning on CBCT in Dentistry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kang HsuDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Da-Yo YuhDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Shao-Chieh LinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, 199, Sec. 1, Zhubei, 302, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Pin-Sian LyuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, 199, Sec. 1, Zhubei, 302, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Guan-Xin PanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, 199, Sec. 1, Zhubei, 302, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi-Chun ZhuangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, 199, Sec. 1, Zhubei, 302, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Chia-Ching ChangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, 199, Sec. 1, Zhubei, 302, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Hsu-Hsia PengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Tung-Yang LeeMaster's Program of Biomedical Informatics and Biomedical Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Cheng-Hsuan JuanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, 199, Sec. 1, Zhubei, 302, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC.
Cheng-En JuanDepartment of Automatic Control Engineering, Feng Chia University, No. 100 Wenhwa Rd., Seatwen, 40724, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi-Jui Liu *Department of Automatic Control Engineering, Feng Chia University, No. 100 Wenhwa Rd., Seatwen, 40724, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC. erliu@fcu.edu.tw.
Chun-Jung Juan *Department of Medical Imaging, Xinglong Rd, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, 199, Sec. 1, Zhubei, 302, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC. peterjuancj@yahoo.com.tw.

Funding

China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Taiwan CMUH110-REC3-180Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 111-2314-B-035-001-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 111-2314-B-039-036Tri-Service General Hospital TSGH-D-111147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning allows automatic segmentation of teeth on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). However, the segmentation performance of deep learning varies among different training strategies. Our aim was to propose a 3.5D U-Net to improve the performance of the U-Net in segmenting teeth on CBCT. This study retrospectively enrolled 24 patients who received CBCT. Five U-Nets, including 2Da U-Net, 2Dc U-Net, 2Ds U-Net, 2.5Da U-Net, 3D U-Net, were trained to segment the teeth. Four additional U-Nets, including 2.5Dv U-Net, 3.5Dv5 U-Net, 3.5Dv4 U-Net, and 3.5Dv3 U-Net, were obtained using majority voting. Mathematical morphology operations including erosion and dilation (E&D) were applied to remove diminutive noise speckles. Segmentation performance was evaluated by fourfold cross validation using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc analysis using Bonferroni correction was used for group comparison. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Performance of U-Nets significantly varies among different training strategies for teeth segmentation on CBCT (P < 0.05). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net and 2.5Dv U-Net showed DSC and PPV significantly higher than any of five originally trained U-Nets (all P < 0.05). E&D significantly improved the DSC, accuracy, specificity, and PPV (all P < 0.005). The 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved highest DSC and accuracy among all U-Nets. The segmentation performance of the U-Net can be improved by majority voting and E&D. Overall speaking, the 3.5Dv5 U-Net achieved the best segmentation performance among all U-Nets.

Indexed as

Deep LearningToothCone-Beam Computed TomographyHeadHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36396696
PMCPMC9672125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.