Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36396309›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Use of social media platforms by migrant and ethnic minority populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

Lucy Pollyanna Goldsmith, May Rowland-Pomp, Kristin Hanson, Anna Deal, Alison F Crawshaw, Sally E Hayward, Felicity Knights, Jessica Carter, Ayesha Ahmad, M Razai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy Pollyanna GoldsmithThe Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6934-1925
May Rowland-PompThe Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Kristin HansonFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University, Kingston-Upon-Thames, London, UK.
Anna DealThe Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Alison F CrawshawThe Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-7258
Sally E HaywardThe Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4105-0990
Felicity KnightsThe Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Jessica CarterThe Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9590-3146
Ayesha AhmadInstitute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's University of London, London, UK.
M RazaiPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6671-5557
Tushna VandrevalaFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Kingston University, Kingston, Surrey, UK.
Sally HargreavesThe Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's University of London, London, UK s.hargreaves@sgul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2974-4348
St George's, University of London · GBKingston University · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMigrants and ethnic minority groups have been disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 and have lower levels of vaccine uptake in some contexts. We aimed to determine the extent and nature of social media use in migrant and ethnic minority communities for COVID-19 information, and implications for preventative health measures including vaccination intent and uptake.

designA systematic review of published and grey literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched databases including Embase, Web of Science, PubMed NIH, CINAHL, facilitated through the WHO Global Research on COVID-19 database from 31 December 2019 to 9 June 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Research reporting the use of social media by migrants and/or ethnic minority groups in relation to COVID-19. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted data on key outcomes, study design, country, population under study and sample size.

results1849 unique records were screened, and 21 data sources were included, including populations in the UK, USA, China, Jordan, Qatar and Turkey. We found evidence of consistent use of a range of social media platforms for COVID-19 information in some migrant and ethnic minority populations (including WeChat, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube), which may stem from difficulty in accessing COVID-19 information in their native languages or from trusted sources. Some evidence suggested circulating misinformation and social media use may be associated with lower participation in preventative health measures, including vaccine intent and uptake, findings which are likely relevant to multiple population groups.

conclusionsSocial media platforms are an important source of information about COVID-19 for some migrant and ethnic minority populations. Urgent actions and further research are now needed to better understand effective approaches to tackling circulating misinformation, and to seize on opportunities to better use social media platforms to support public health communication and improve vaccine uptake. REGISTRATION: This study has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021259190).

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaTransients and MigrantsEthnic and Racial MinoritiesEthnicityHumansMinority GroupsPandemicsCOVID-19ethnic minority groupsMigrantpublic healthworld wide web technology

Identifiers

PMID36396309
PMCPMC9676419
OpenAlexW4309268871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.