Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36396308›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making through a shared decision-making intervention (A231701CD): protocol for a cluster randomised clinical trial.

Jessica R Schumacher, David Zahrieh, Selina Chow, John Taylor, Rachel Wills, Bret M Hanlon, Paul J Rathouz, Jennifer L Tucholka, Heather B Neuman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03766009 (Increasing Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients' Engagement in Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Making Through a Shared Decision Making Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03766009 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Increasing Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients' Engagement in Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Making Through a Shared Decision Making Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyRan2019 to 2026Enrolled627ConditionsBreast Cancer Stage 0, Breast Cancer Stage I, Breast Cancer Stage II, Breast Cancer Stage IIIArmsUsual Care, Web-based decision aid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Providing information to prepare breast cancer patients for their surgical consultation: barriers and recommendations (an analysis from Alliance A231701CD).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica R SchumacherDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
David ZahriehDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA.
Selina ChowMedicine-Geriatrics and Palliative Care, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
John TaylorMedicine-Geriatrics and Palliative Care, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rachel WillsMedicine-Geriatrics and Palliative Care, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Bret M HanlonDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4517-1204
Paul J RathouzPopulation Health, University of Texas at Austin Dell Seton Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.
Jennifer L TucholkaDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Heather B NeumanDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA neuman@surgery.wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-8333
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Chicago · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USSeton Medical Center · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
National Clinical Trials Network Research at the University of WisconsinUG1CA233277 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lisa M Barroilhet, Andrew M. Baschnagel · 2019 to 2026
$4.9M
Increasing Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients' Engagement in Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Making through a Shared Decision Making InterventionR01HS025194 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NEUMAN, HEATHER B · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025194NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocioeconomic disparities for breast cancer surgical care exist. Although the aetiology of the observed socioeconomic disparities is likely multifactorial, patient engagement during the surgical consult is critical. Shared decision-making may reduce health disparities by addressing barriers to patient engagement in decision-making that disproportionately impact socioeconomically disadvantaged patients. In this trial, we test the impact of a decision aid on increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multisite randomised trial is conducted through 10 surgical clinics within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). We plan a stepped-wedge design with clinics randomised to the time of transition from usual care to the decision aid arm. Study participants are female patients, aged ≥18 years, with newly diagnosed stage 0-III breast cancer who are planning breast surgery. Data collection includes a baseline surgeon survey, baseline patient survey, audio-recording of the surgeon-patient consultation, a follow-up patient survey and medical record data review. Interviews and focus groups are conducted with a subset of patients, surgeons and clinic stakeholders. The effectiveness of the decision aid at increasing patient engagement (primary outcome) is evaluated using generalised linear mixed-effects models. The extent to which the effect of the decision aid intervention on patient engagement is mediated through the mitigation of barriers is tested in joint linear structural equation models. Qualitative interviews explore how barriers impact engagement, especially for socioeconomically disadvantaged women. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board, and Certificate of Confidentiality has been obtained. We plan to disseminate the findings through journal publications and national meetings, including the NCORP network. Our findings will advance the science of medical decision-making with the potential to reduce socioeconomic health disparities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03766009).

Indexed as

Breast Carcinoma In SituBreast NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansMastectomyPatient ParticipationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBreast surgeryBreast tumoursProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID36396308
PMCPMC9677005
OpenAlexW4309268930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.