Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36396303›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

LAMC2 as a prognostic biomarker in human cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tao Fu, Jun-Xia Liu, Juan Xie, Zhen Gao, Zhenshan Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. LAMC2Cancer science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tao FuChongqing Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Jun-Xia LiuChongqing Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Juan XieChongqing Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, Chongqing, China.
Zhen GaoCollege of Animal Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, China.
Zhenshan YangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China le1730@126.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-9947
Chongqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNNorthwest A&F University · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccumulating evidence suggested that the laminin γ2 (LAMC2) expression level was upregulated in various cancers. However, the potential prognostic value of LAMC2 in cancers remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to clarify the association of LAMC2 expression with prognosis.

designWe searched Embase, Web of Science and PubMed (up to 25 November 2021) to collect all eligible studies, and meta-analysis was performed to interpret the association of LAMC2 expression with clinicopathological parameters, overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR INCLUDING STUDIES: We included studies that investigate the relationship between LAMC2 and prognosis of cancers, patients were divided into two groups, and associations of LAMC2 expression with clinicopathological features were described.

resultsSeven studies were finally included. We found that increased LAMC2 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (log OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.38, p<0.001), tumour-node-metastasis stages (log OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.50, p<0.001) and tumour status (log OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.68, p<0.001), but not with age (log OR -0.05, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.27, p=0.75) or gender (log OR -0.07, 95% CI -0.52 to 0.38, p=0.75). In addition, higher LAMC2 expression was found to be significantly associated with OS/PFS/DSS (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.40, p<0.001). A similar result was found in The Cancer Genome Atlas database. High LAMC2 expression was significantly associated with OS in lung adenocarcinoma, mesothelioma, skin cutaneous melanoma, neck squamous cell carcinoma and brain lower grade glioma.

conclusionOur results suggested that higher LAMC2 expression was correlated with worse survival, lymph node metastasis, tumour-node-metastasis stages and tumour status. This study was subject to inherent limitations, but the results presented here provide insights regarding the potential use of LAMC2 as a biomarker for human cancer. STUDY REGISTRATION: researchregistry.com (researchregistry1319).

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansLamininLymphatic MetastasisPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorLAMC2 protein, humanLamininAdult oncologyOncogenesONCOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID36396303
PMCPMC9677043
OpenAlexW4309268929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.