Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36396039›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2023

Analytical approaches to evaluating hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Rubymel J Knupp, Akila Subramaniam, Alan N T Tita, Rachel Sinkey, Ashley N Battarbee

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rubymel J KnuppCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee). Electronic address: rubymel.knupp@pediatrix.com.
Akila SubramaniamCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee).
Alan N T TitaCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee).
Rachel SinkeyCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee).
Ashley N BattarbeeCenter for Women's Reproductive Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL (Drs Knupp, Subramaniam, Tita, Sinkey, and Battarbee).

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BARBARA A GOWER · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
The ACHIEVE Trial: Achieving longer gestation in preeclampsia via antihypertensive therapy.K23HL159331 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Rachel G Sinkey · 2022 to 2026
$884k
Close the GAP: Glycemic control after Antenatal corticosteroids in women with Pregestational diabetesK23HD103875 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BATTARBEE, ASHLEY NICOLE · 2021 to 2025
$826k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL159331NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD103875NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData from the A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management study suggested that low-risk pregnant patients randomized to expectant management at term had a higher risk for developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy than pregnant patients randomized to elective induction at 39 weeks. In addition, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were reported to decrease with advancing gestational age when comparing outcomes by gestational age at delivery.

objectiveThis study aimed to verify these contrasting findings by evaluating the relationship between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at term and gestational age at delivery. STUDY

designThis was a secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort study of nulliparous pregnant patients with singleton gestations (from the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be). Pregnant patients who delivered ≥37+0 weeks' gestation were included. Patients were excluded if they did not provide consent for data release in subsequent studies or if they had missing outcome data. The primary outcome was hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, defined as gestational hypertension or preeclampsia with or without severe features according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in the following 2 ways: analysis (1), incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy by gestational age week among all ongoing pregnancies and analysis (2), the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy by gestational age week among deliveries at that gestational age week. It was assumed that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were not expectantly managed at term.

resultsOf the 8011 pregnant patients included in this analysis, 1003 (12.5%) had hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: 162 (24.5%) delivered at 37+0 to 37+6 weeks' gestation, 232 (18%) delivered at 38+0 to 38+6 weeks, 310 (12.1%) delivered at 39+0 to 39+6 weeks, 207 (8.7%) delivered at 40+0 to 40+6 weeks, and 92 (8.1%) delivered at ≥41+0 weeks. In analysis 1, the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increased with advancing gestational age among all ongoing pregnancies with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (2.0% at 37 weeks and 8.1% at 41 weeks). In analysis 2, the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy decreased with advancing gestational age among deliveries at that gestational age week alone (24.5% at 37 weeks and 8.1% at 41 weeks).

conclusionOur results confirm the findings from the A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management study showing that the risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increases with advancing gestational age, but hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is more common among deliveries at earlier gestational ages. These key differences illustrate how important the study design and analytical approach are to accurately interpret results and apply findings clinically.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPre-EclampsiaFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective Studiesexpectant managementgestational hypertensionhypertensioninductionpreeclampsiapreeclampsia without severe featurespreeclampsia with severe features

Identifiers

PMID36396039
PMCPMC10257937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.