Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36395960›Full record

ReviewBone2023

Genetically engineered zebrafish as models of skeletal development and regeneration.

Katrin Henke, D'Juan T Farmer, Xubo Niu, Jessica M Kraus, Jenna L Galloway, Daniel W Youngstrom

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Loss ofJBMR plus · 2025
    Article
  4. MicroCT Scanning and Analysis of the Zebrafish Skeleton.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Loss ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katrin HenkeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: khenke@emory.edu.
D'Juan T FarmerDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: djuanfar@mcdb.ucla.edu.
Xubo NiuCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: xniu@mgh.harvard.edu.
Jessica M KrausDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. Electronic address: jkraus@uchc.edu.
Jenna L GallowayCenter for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: jenna_galloway@hms.harvard.edu.
Daniel W YoungstromDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. Electronic address: dwyoungstrom@uchc.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUConn Health · USEmory University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Mechanisms underlying tendon regeneration and attachment site pattern restorationR01AR074541 · NIAMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GALLOWAY, JENNA L · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) are aquatic vertebrates with significant homology to their terrestrial counterparts. While zebrafish have a centuries-long track record in developmental and regenerative biology, their utility has grown exponentially with the onset of modern genetics. This is exemplified in studies focused on skeletal development and repair. Herein, the numerous contributions of zebrafish to our understanding of the basic science of cartilage, bone, tendon/ligament, and other skeletal tissues are described, with a particular focus on applications to development and regeneration. We summarize the genetic strengths that have made the zebrafish a powerful model to understand skeletal biology. We also highlight the large body of existing tools and techniques available to understand skeletal development and repair in the zebrafish and introduce emerging methods that will aid in novel discoveries in skeletal biology. Finally, we review the unique contributions of zebrafish to our understanding of regeneration and highlight diverse routes of repair in different contexts of injury. We conclude that zebrafish will continue to fill a niche of increasing breadth and depth in the study of basic cellular mechanisms of skeletal biology.

Indexed as

TendonsZebrafishAnimalsBone and BonesCartilageDevelopmentGenetic engineeringRegenerationSkeletonTransgenesisZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID36395960
PMCPMC11080330
OpenAlexW4308977220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.