Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36395847›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2023

Generating environmental sampling and testing data for micro- and nanoplastics for use in life cycle impact assessment.

Cecilia Askham, Valentina H Pauna, Anne-Marie Boulay, Peter Fantke, Olivier Jolliet, Jérôme Lavoie, Andy M Booth, Claire Coutris, Francesca Verones, Miriam Weber and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Cecilia AskhamNorwegian Institute for Sustainability Research (NORSUS), Stadion 4, 1671 Kråkerøy, Norway. Electronic address: cecilia@norsus.no.
Valentina H PaunaNorwegian Institute for Sustainability Research (NORSUS), Stadion 4, 1671 Kråkerøy, Norway; International PhD Programme/UNESCO Chair "Environment, Resources and Sustainable Development", Department of Science and Technology, Parthenope University of Naples, Centro Direzionale, Isola C4, 80143 Naples, Italy.
Anne-Marie BoulayCIRAIG, Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada.
Peter FantkeQuantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 424, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Olivier JollietQuantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 424, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Jérôme LavoieCIRAIG, UQÀM/ISE-Institute of Environmental Sciences, Montreal, Canada.
Andy M BoothSINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway.
Claire CoutrisNIBIO Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Division of Environment and Natural Resources, Ås, Norway.
Francesca VeronesNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Miriam WeberHYDRA Marine Sciences GmbH, Bühl, Germany.
Martina G VijverLeiden University, Institute of Environmental Sciences, the Netherlands.
Amy LusherNorwegian Institute of Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway; Department of Biological Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Carla HajjarCIRAIG, Chemical Engineering Department, Polytechnique Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ongoing efforts focus on quantifying plastic pollution and describing and estimating the related magnitude of exposure and impacts on human and environmental health. Data gathered during such work usually follows a receptor perspective. However, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) represents an emitter perspective. This study examines existing data gathering and reporting approaches for field and laboratory studies on micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) exposure and effects relevant to LCA data inputs. The outcomes indicate that receptor perspective approaches do not typically provide suitable or sufficiently harmonised data. Improved design is needed in the sampling, testing and recording of results using harmonised, validated and comparable methods, with more comprehensive reporting of relevant data. We propose a three-level set of requirements for data recording and reporting to increase the potential for LCA studies and models to utilise data gathered in receptor-oriented studies. We show for which purpose such data can be used as inputs to LCA, particularly in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods. Implementing these requirements will facilitate proper integration of the potential environmental impacts of plastic losses from human activity (e.g. litter) into LCA. Then, the impacts of plastic emissions can eventually be connected and compared with other environmental issues related to anthropogenic activities.

Indexed as

EnvironmentEnvironmental PollutionAnimalsHumansLife Cycle StagesEcotoxicologyHarmonizing data collectionLife cycle assessmentMicroplasticsMonitoringNanoplasticsRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID36395847
PMCPMC9760571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.