Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36395654›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of hygiene and environmental health2023

Drinking water and the implications for gender equity and empowerment: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence.

Kimberly De Guzman, Gabriela Stone, Audrey R Yang, Kristen E Schaffer, Shelton Lo, Rola Kojok, Colette R Kirkpatrick, Ada G Del Pozo, Tina T Le, Lindsey DePledge and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Risk Factors Associated with Urothelial Bladder Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kimberly De GuzmanDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Gabriela StoneDepartment of Global Health, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Audrey R YangDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Kristen E SchafferDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Shelton LoT.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Rola KojokDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, Public Health Program, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Colette R KirkpatrickDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Ada G Del PozoDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Tina T LeDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, United States.
Lindsey DePledgeLondon School of Economics, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth L FrostSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, The Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; The Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Georgia L KayserThe Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: gkayser@ucsd.edu.
University of California San Diego · USSan Diego State University · USColumbia University · USHarvard University · USLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GB

Funding

Pesticide exposures, mental health and endocrine disruption among children growing up near pesticide spray sites.K01ES031697 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI KAYSER, GEORGIA L. · 2020 to 2023
$594k
NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES031697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafe drinking water is a fundamental human right, yet more than 785 million people do not have access to it. The burden of water management disproportionately falls on women and young girls, and they suffer the health, psychosocial, political, educational, and economic effects. While water conditions and disease outcomes have been widely studied, few studies have summarized the research on drinking water and implications for gender equity and empowerment (GEE).

methodsA systematic review of primary literature published between 1980 and 2019 was conducted on drinking water exposures and management and the implications for GEE. Ten databases were utilized (EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, ProQuest, Campbell, the British Library for Development Studies, SSRN, 3ie International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, and clinicaltrials.gov). Drinking water studies with an all-female cohort or disaggregated findings according to gender were included.

resultsA total of 1280 studies were included. GEE outcomes were summarized in five areas: health, psychosocial stress, political power and decision-making, social-educational conditions, and economic and time-use conditions. Water quality exposures and implications for women's health dominated the literature reviewed. Women experienced higher rates of bladder cancer when exposed to arsenic, trihalomethanes, and chlorine in drinking water and higher rates of breast cancer due to arsenic, trichloroethylene, and disinfection byproducts in drinking water, compared to men. Women that were exposed to arsenic experienced higher incidence rates of anemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to those that were not exposed. Water-related skin diseases were associated with increased levels of psychosocial stress and social ostracization among women. Women had fewer decision-making responsibilities, economic independence, and employment opportunities around water compared to men.

conclusionThis systematic review confirms the interconnected nature of gender and WaSH outcomes. With growing attention directed towards gender equity and empowerment within WaSH, this analysis provides key insights to inform future research and policy.

Indexed as

ArsenicDrinking WaterWaterborne DiseasesFemaleGender EquityHumansMalePregnancyTrihalomethanesArsenicDrinking WaterTrihalomethanesGender Equity and EmpowermentgirlsSanitation and Hygienesystematic reviewWaSHWaterwater qualitywomen

Identifiers

PMID36395654
PMCPMC12834121
OpenAlexW4309030312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.