ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2022
Enhancing Biomolecular Simulations with Hybrid Potentials Incorporating NMR Data.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress toward linking single-molecule behavior and condensate material properties.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Energy Landscape Analysis of Membrane Proteins Using NMR-Based Hybrid Restraint Potentials.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Integrating NMR Restraints into Coarse-Grained Simulations: Toward Accurate Conformational Ensembles of Complex Protein Systems.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Protein Kinase A Phosphorylates a Conformationally High-energy State of Raf Kinase Inhibitory Protein.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Article
- Structure and Dynamics of the Misfolding Intermediate in the Pathogenic T183A Prion Protein Mutant.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Article
- Thermal tuning of protein hydration in a hyperthermophilic enzyme.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some recent advances in biomolecular simulation and global optimization have used hybrid restraint potentials, where harmonic restraints that penalize conformations inconsistent with experimental data are combined with molecular mechanics force fields. These hybrid potentials can be used to improve the performance of molecular dynamics, structure prediction, energy landscape sampling, and other computational methods that rely on the accuracy of the underlying force field. Here, we develop a hybrid restraint potential based on NapShift, an artificial neural network trained to predict protein nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts from sequence and structure. In addition to providing accurate predictions of experimental chemical shifts, NapShift is fully differentiable with respect to atomic coordinates, which allows us to use it for structural refinement. By employing NapShift to predict chemical shifts from the protein conformation at each simulation step, we can compute an energy penalty and the corresponding hybrid restraint forces based on the difference between the predicted values and the experimental chemical shifts. The performance of the hybrid restraint potential was benchmarked using both basin-hopping global optimization and molecular dynamics simulations. In each case, the NapShift hybrid potential improved the accuracy, leading to better structure prediction via basin-hopping and increased local stability in molecular dynamics simulations. Our results suggest that neural network hybrid potentials based on NMR observables can enhance a broad range of molecular simulation methods, and the prediction accuracy will improve as more experimental training data become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.