Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36395194›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2022

Low transmission of SARS-CoV-2 derived from children in family clusters: An observational study of family households in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area, Spain.

Maria Mele-Casas, Cristian Launes, Mariona F de Sevilla, Maria Hernandez-Garcia, Gemma Pons-Tomas, Quique Bassat, Victoria Fumado, Claudia Fortuny, Aleix Garcia-Miquel, Elisenda Bonet-Carne and 18 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Maria Mele-CasasPediatric Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristian LaunesPediatric Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0913-9303
Mariona F de SevillaPediatric Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0568-1282
Maria Hernandez-GarciaPediatric Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Gemma Pons-TomasPediatric Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Quique BassatPediatric Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Victoria FumadoInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Claudia FortunyInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Aleix Garcia-MiquelBCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Elisenda Bonet-CarneBCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Clara PratsDepartment of Physics, Computational Biology and Complex Systems (BIOCOM-SC), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Castelldefels, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-7559
Sara AjanovicISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta CubellsInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joana ClaverolInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel Penela-SanchezPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina JouInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sara AriasISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria BalanzaISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Barbara BaroISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Pere Millat-MartinezISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sergio AlonsoDepartment of Physics, Computational Biology and Complex Systems (BIOCOM-SC), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Castelldefels, Spain.
Enric Alvarez-LacalleDepartment of Physics, Computational Biology and Complex Systems (BIOCOM-SC), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Castelldefels, Spain.
Marti CatalaCentre for Comparative Medicine and Bioimage (CMCiB), Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3308-9905
Daniel CuadrasStatistics Department, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen Muñoz-AlmagroInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eduard GratacosBCNatal | Fetal Medicine Research Center (Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Iolanda JordanInstitut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan Jose Garcia-GarciaPediatric Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3483-528X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily clusters offer a good opportunity to study viral transmission in a stable setting. We aimed to analyze the specific role of children in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within households.

methodsA prospective, longitudinal, observational study, including children with documented acute SARS-CoV-2 infection attending 22 summer-schools in Barcelona, Spain, was performed. Moreover, other patients and families coming from other school-like environments that voluntarily accessed the study were also studied. A longitudinal follow-up (5 weeks) of the family clusters was conducted to determine whether the children considered to be primary cases were able to transmit the virus to other family members. The household reproduction number (Re*) and the secondary attack rate (SAR) were calculated.

results1905 children from the summer schools were screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection and 22 (1.15%) tested positive. Moreover, 32 additional children accessed the study voluntarily. Of these, 37 children and their 26 households were studied completely. In half of the cases (13/26), the primary case was considered to be a child and secondary transmission to other members of the household was observed in 3/13, with a SAR of 14.2% and a Re* of 0.46. Conversely, the SAR of adult primary cases was 72.2% including the kids that gave rise to the contact tracing study, and 61.5% without them, and the estimated Re* was 2.6. In 4/13 of the paediatric primary cases (30.0%), nasopharyngeal PCR was persistently positive > 1 week after diagnosis, and 3/4 of these children infected another family member (p<0.01).

conclusionsChildren may not be the main drivers of the infection in household transmission clusters in the study population. A prolonged positive PCR could be associated with higher transmissibility.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultChildFamily CharacteristicsHumansProspective StudiesSpain

Identifiers

PMID36395194
PMCPMC9671318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.