Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36395190›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Brain activity response to cues during gait in Parkinson's disease: A study protocol.

Rodrigo Vitório, Rosie Morris, Julia Das, Richard Walker, Martina Mancini, Samuel Stuart

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04863560 (Brain Activity Response to Cues During Gait in Parkinson's), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04863560 unknown statusnot on this map

Brain Activity Response to Cues During Gait in Parkinson's

TypeobservationalSponsorNorthumbria UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsAuditory Cueing, Visual Cueing, tactile Cueing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo VitórioDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-9452
Rosie MorrisDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Julia DasDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-6695
Richard WalkerNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Martina ManciniDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Samuel StuartDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6846-9372
Northumbria University · GBNorth Tyneside General Hospital · GBOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various cueing strategies (internal and external) have been used to alleviate gait deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it remains unclear which type of cueing strategy is most effective at different disease stages or with more severe walking impairment, such as freezing of gait (FOG). The underlying neural mechanisms of response to cueing are also unknown. This trial aims to: (i) determine brain activity response to cue stimulus (internal, visual, auditory or tactile) when walking in PD and; (ii) examine changes in brain activity to cues at different stages of PD. This ongoing single-site study uses an exploratory observational design, with laboratory application of cues for gait deficit. A total of 80 people with PD who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled. Participants are split into groups dependent on their disease stage (classified with the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale); n = 20 H&YI; n = 30 H&YII; n = 30 H&YIII. Within the H&Y stage II and III groups, we will also ensure recruitment of a sub-group of 15 individuals with FOG within each group. Participants perform walking tasks under several conditions: baseline walking without cues; randomized cued walking conditions [internal and external (visual, auditory and tactile) cues]. A combined functional near-infrared spectroscopy and electroencephalography system quantifies cortical brain activity while walking. Inertial sensors are used to assess gait. Primary outcome measures are cue-related changes in cortical brain activity while walking, including the relative change in cortical HbO2 and the power spectral densities at alpha (8-13Hz), beta (13-30Hz), delta (0.5-4Hz), theta (4-8Hz) and gamma (30-40Hz) frequency bandwidths. Secondary outcome measures are cue-related changes in spatiotemporal gait characteristics. Findings will enhance our understanding about the cortical responses to different cueing strategies and how they are influenced by PD progression and FOG status. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04863560; April 28, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04863560).

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicParkinson DiseaseBrainCuesGaitHumansObservational Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID36395190
PMCPMC9671304
OpenAlexW4309264127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.