Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36395187›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Evaluation of culture conditions for osteoclastogenesis in RAW264.7 cells.

Yin Cheng, Haixia Liu, Jing Li, Yujie Ma, Changheng Song, Yuhan Wang, Pei Li, Yanjing Chen, Zhiguo Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. OptimizingPeerJ · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring theMetabolites · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. In Vitro Effects ofJournal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yin ChengInstitute of Basic Theory, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Haixia LiuInstitute of Basic Theory, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2198-1015
Jing LiInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Center of Excellence in Tissue Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of New Drug Development and Clinical Trial of Stem Cell Therapy (BZ0381), Beijing, China.
Yujie MaInstitute of Basic Theory, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Changheng SongInstitute of Basic Theory, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuhan WangInstitute of Basic Theory, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Pei LiInstitute of Basic Theory, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanjing ChenInstitute of Basic Theory, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhiguo ZhangInstitute of Basic Theory, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoclasts are the only multinucleated cells in vivo responsible for bone resorption and are vital for regulating bone remodeling and maintaining bone mass. The RAW264.7 cell line is widely used to study osteoclastic differentiation and biological molecular mechanism. However, protocols for inducing osteoclast formation in RAW264.7 cells vary considerably between laboratories, hindering the replication of results. Therefore, we tested the influence of culture conditions on osteoclast differentiation, including cell density and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) concentrations with or without macrophage colony-stimulating factors (M-CSF). Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was used to detect the morphology of osteoclasts. qPCR was used to detect gene expression of osteoclast-specific gene marker cathepsin K (CTSK), osteoclast transcription factors c-Fos and nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1). The bone resorption function was evaluated by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RANKL treatment increased multinucleated osteoclasts formation and increased CTSK, c-Fos and NFATc1 gene expression. Compared with RANKL treatment, M-CSF significantly decreased multinucleated osteoclasts formation, reduced CTSK gene expression and had little effect on c-Fos and NFATc1 gene expression. Concerning bone resorption activity, RANKL treatment increased bone resorption pits on bovine bone slices. Significantly higher levels of osteoclastogenesis were observed with RAW264.7-cell density of 2×104 cells/well in 24-well plates. Our results suggest that the addition of 50 ng/ml M-CSF has no positive effect on osteoclastogenesis. RANKL treatment and cell density contribute to osteoclast formation, and the optimal conditions are beneficial when exploring osteoclast function and mechanism.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionOsteogenesisAnimalsCattleCell DifferentiationMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorNFATC Transcription FactorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorNFATC Transcription FactorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos

Identifiers

PMID36395187
PMCPMC9671299
OpenAlexW4309218234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.