ArticlePloS one2022
Feasibility of flow-related enhancement brain perfusion MRI.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repeatability of cerebral arteriovenous pulse wave propagation in flow-related enhancement MRI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cerebral microcirculatory pulse wave propagation and pulse wave amplitude mapping in retrospectively gated MRI.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBrain perfusion imaging is of enormous importance for various neurological diseases. Fast gradient-echo sequences offering flow-related enhancement (FREE) could present a basis to generate perfusion-weighted maps. In this study, we obtained perfusion-weighted maps without contrast media by a previously described postprocessing algorithm from the field of functional lung MRI. At first, the perfusion signal was analyzed in fast low-angle shot (FLASH) and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequences. Secondly, perfusion maps were compared to pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) MRI in a healthy cohort. Thirdly, the feasibility of the new technique was demonstrated in a small selected group of patients with metastases and acute stroke.
methodsOne participant was examined with bSSFP and FLASH sequences at 1.5T and 3T, different flip angles and slice thicknesses. Twenty-five volunteers had bSSFP imaging and pCASL MRI. Three patients with cerebral metastases and one with acute ischemic stroke had bSSFP imaging and were compared to T1 post-contrast images and CT perfusion. Frequency analyses, SNR and perfusion contrast were compared at different flip angles and slice thicknesses. Regional correlations and Sorensen-Dice overlap were calculated in the healthy cohort. Dice overlap of the pathologies in the patient cohort were calculated.
resultsThe bSSFP sequence presented detectable perfusion signal within brain vessel and parenchyma together with superior SNR compared to FLASH. Perfusion contrast and its corticomedullary differentiation increased with flip angle. Mean regional correlation was 0.36 and highly significant between FREE maps and pCASL and grey and white matter Dice match were 72% and 60% in the healthy cohort. Pathologies presented good overlap between FREE perfusion-weighted and T1 post-contrast images.
conclusionThe feasibility of FREE brain perfusion imaging has been shown in a healthy cohort and selected patient cases with brain metastases and acute stroke. The study demonstrates a new approach for non-contrast brain perfusion imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.