Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36395166›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Effects of poultry by-products inclusion in dry food on nutrient digestibility and fecal quality in Beagle dogs.

Amr Abd El-Wahab, Anna Lisa Zeiger, Bussarakam Chuppava, Christian Visscher, Josef Kamphues

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Protein hydrolysates fromTranslational animal science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amr Abd El-WahabInstitute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2947-6737
Anna Lisa ZeigerInstitute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Bussarakam ChuppavaInstitute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2144-4930
Christian VisscherInstitute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.
Josef KamphuesInstitute for Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal by-product meals show large variability in diet digestibility. This study aimed to provide information on including bone protein meal (BPM) or feather meal (FM) in extruded dog diets with regard to digestibility and fecal characteristics in two trials. In the first trial, compared to the control (BPM0), 6, 12, and 24% of the basic diets were replaced by BPM (BPM6, BPM12, and BPM24, respectively). In the second trial, in comparison to the control (FM0), 5, 10, and 20% of the basic diets were replaced by FM (FM5, FM10, and FM20, respectively). In both trials, six Beagle dogs (BW 17.3±2.14 and 18.1±2.04 kg for trials 1 and 2, respectively) participated in a crossover experiment design. Five days were used as wash-out before each experimental period for each trial. The fecal consistency scores were based on a 5-point scale (1 = very hard, 2 = solid, well formed "optimum", and 5 = watery diarrhea). In the first trial, results showed that the apparent digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, and crude fat was significantly lower for dogs fed BPM6 compared to those fed BPM24. There was a lower number of dogs with a fecal consistency score value > 2 (16.7%) among those fed BPM6 (median = 2, Interquartile range (IQR) = 0) compared to those fed BPM24 (83.3%). The fecal dry matter content was significantly (p < 0.05) the highest (39.4%±2.15) for dogs fed BPM6. In the second trial, the data revealed that dogs fed FM0 had significantly (p < 0.05) the highest organic matter digestibility (87.2%±1.05), while dogs fed FM20 had significantly (p < 0.05) the lowest crude fat digestibility (95.0%±0.95). Inclusion of FM at 10% or 20% in the diet decreased fecal dry matter significantly (29.0%±2.10 and 27.9%±2.46, respectively) compared to those animals offered FM0 (31.1%±2.56). Among those dogs fed FM0 and FM5, there was a lower significant number of dogs with a fecal score value > 2 (16.7% and 16.7%, respectively; p < 0.05). While the fecal score was significantly a higher (median = 4, IQR = 0) for dogs fed FM20. Including FM at any level in the diet resulted in significantly higher levels of iso-butyric and iso-valeric acids compared to FM0. These findings in both trials suggest that apparent crude protein digestibility was not affected when diets containing BPM up to 24% and FM up to 20% were offered, but fecal quality was reduced.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDigestionAnimalsDogsFecesNutrientsPoultryNutrients

Identifiers

PMID36395166
PMCPMC9671379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.