Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36395078›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2022

Education interacts with genetic variants near GJD2, RBFOX1, LAMA2, KCNQ5 and LRRC4C to confer susceptibility to myopia.

Rosie Clark, Alfred Pozarickij, Pirro G Hysi, Kyoko Ohno-Matsui, Cathy Williams, Jeremy A Guggenheim, UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Whole genome sequencing and analysis of familial nonsyndromic congenital tooth agenesis].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026
    Article
  3. IMI-Myopia Genetics Report.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosie ClarkSchool of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Alfred PozarickijSchool of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Pirro G HysiSection of Ophthalmology, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-2510
Kyoko Ohno-MatsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8375-6879
Cathy WilliamsCentre for Academic Child Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jeremy A GuggenheimSchool of Optometry & Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5164-340X
UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium
Cardiff University · GBKing's College London · GBTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myopia most often develops during school age, with the highest incidence in countries with intensive education systems. Interactions between genetic variants and educational exposure are hypothesized to confer susceptibility to myopia, but few such interactions have been identified. Here, we aimed to identify genetic variants that interact with education level to confer susceptibility to myopia. Two groups of unrelated participants of European ancestry from UK Biobank were studied. A 'Stage-I' sample of 88,334 participants whose refractive error (avMSE) was measured by autorefraction and a 'Stage-II' sample of 252,838 participants who self-reported their age-of-onset of spectacle wear (AOSW) but who did not undergo autorefraction. Genetic variants were prioritized via a 2-step screening process in the Stage-I sample: Step 1 was a genome-wide association study for avMSE; Step 2 was a variance heterogeneity analysis for avMSE. Genotype-by-education interaction tests were performed in the Stage-II sample, with University education coded as a binary exposure. On average, participants were 58 years-old and left full-time education when they were 18 years-old; 35% reported University level education. The 2-step screening strategy in the Stage-I sample prioritized 25 genetic variants (GWAS P < 1e-04; variance heterogeneity P < 5e-05). In the Stage-II sample, 19 of the 25 (76%) genetic variants demonstrated evidence of variance heterogeneity, suggesting the majority were true positives. Five genetic variants located near GJD2, RBFOX1, LAMA2, KCNQ5 and LRRC4C had evidence of a genotype-by-education interaction in the Stage-II sample (P < 0.002) and consistent evidence of a genotype-by-education interaction in the Stage-I sample. For all 5 variants, University-level education was associated with an increased effect of the risk allele. In this cohort, additional years of education were associated with an enhanced effect of genetic variants that have roles including axon guidance and the development of neuronal synapses and neural circuits.

Indexed as

MyopiaRefractive ErrorsAdolescentAllelesEducational StatusGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMiddle AgedRNA Splicing FactorsRBFOX1 protein, humanRNA Splicing Factors

Identifiers

PMID36395078
PMCPMC9671369
OpenAlexW4309264299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.