Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394959›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Associations Between Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Decisions and Exposure to Vaccine Information in Social Media.

Josheili Y Llavona-Ortiz, Katherine E Spanos, Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Gail D'Souza, Jessica Gall Myrick, Kristin K Sznajder, William A Calo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Josheili Y Llavona-OrtizDepartment of Public Health Sciences, 12310Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1580-4832
Katherine E Spanos12310Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0423-159X
Jennifer L KraschnewskiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, 12310Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Gail D'SouzaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, 12310Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Jessica Gall MyrickDonald P. Bellisario College of Communications, 311370Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Kristin K SznajderDepartment of Public Health Sciences, 12310Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
William A CaloDepartment of Public Health Sciences, 12310Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8452-5063

Funding

HPV ECHO: Increasing the adoption of evidence-based communication strategies for HPV vaccination in rural primary care practicesR37CA253279 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CALO, WILLIAM ALEXIS · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA253279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExposure to different types of vaccine information in social media can result in parents making disparate vaccine decisions, including not following national guidelines for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. We sought to characterize parents' exposure to and engagement with information about HPV vaccination in social media, and the associations between exposure to such information and vaccine decisions for their adolescent children.

methodsIn 2019, we conducted a web-based survey with a national sample of 1073 parents of adolescents who use social media. The survey assessed whether parents have seen information in favor, against, or mixed about HPV vaccination. Multivariable logistic regressions assessed correlates of vaccine decisions, including HPV vaccine initiation, delay, and refusal.

resultsSixty-one percent of parents reported that their children have initiated HPV vaccination. Over one-third of parents (37%) reported seeing HPV vaccine information on social media, which was either in favor (20%), against (5%), or a mix (12%). Parents exposed to information in favor were more likely than those who saw no information to have initiated HPV vaccination (OR = 1.74, 95% CI:1.24, 2.44). Parents exposed to information against vaccination were more likely to have delayed (OR = 3.29, 95% CI:1.66, 6.51) or refused (OR = 4.72, 95% CI:2.35, 9.50) HPV vaccination. Exposure to mixed information was also significantly associated with vaccine delay and refusal. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that the type of information seen on social media regarding HPV vaccination may influence the decisions parents make about vaccinating their children. Efforts should be sought to increase online information in favor of HPV vaccination and combat vaccine misinformation in social media.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesSocial MediaAdolescentChildHumansParentsVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccineshealth communicationhuman papillomavirus vaccineparentssocial mediavaccine refusal

Identifiers

PMID36394959
PMCPMC9679613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.