Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394940›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2022

Enhancing Food Intake Tracking in Long-term Care With Automated Food Imaging and Nutrient Intake Tracking (AFINI-T) Technology: Validation and Feasibility Assessment.

Kaylen Pfisterer, Robert Amelard, Jennifer Boger, Heather Keller, Audrey Chung, Alexander Wong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaylen Pfisterer *Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-0705
Robert Amelard *Schlegel-University of Waterloo Institute for Aging, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-3470
Jennifer BogerDepartment of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-151X
Heather KellerSchlegel-University of Waterloo Institute for Aging, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7782-8103
Audrey ChungDepartment of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2637-5719
Alexander WongDepartment of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5295-2797
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHalf of long-term care (LTC) residents are malnourished, leading to increased hospitalization, mortality, and morbidity, with low quality of life. Current tracking methods are subjective and time-consuming.

objectiveThis paper presented the automated food imaging and nutrient intake tracking technology designed for LTC.

methodsA needs assessment was conducted with 21 participating staff across 12 LTC and retirement homes. We created 2 simulated LTC intake data sets comprising modified (664/1039, 63.91% plates) and regular (375/1039, 36.09% plates) texture foods. Overhead red-green-blue-depth images of plated foods were acquired, and foods were segmented using a pretrained food segmentation network. We trained a novel convolutional autoencoder food feature extractor network using an augmented UNIMIB2016 food data set. A meal-specific food classifier was appended to the feature extractor and tested on our simulated LTC food intake data sets. Food intake (percentage) was estimated as the differential volume between classified full portion and leftover plates.

resultsThe needs assessment yielded 13 nutrients of interest, requirement for objectivity and repeatability, and account for real-world environmental constraints. For 12 meal scenarios with up to 15 classes each, the top-1 classification accuracy was 88.9%, with mean intake error of -0.4 (SD 36.7) mL. Nutrient intake estimation by volume was strongly linearly correlated with nutrient estimates from mass (r

conclusionsThe automated food imaging and nutrient intake tracking approach is a deep learning-powered computational nutrient sensing system that appears to be feasible (validated accuracy against gold-standard weighed food method, positive end user engagement) and may provide a novel means for more accurate and objective tracking of LTC residents' food intake to support and prevent malnutrition tracking strategies.

Indexed as

agingautomated nutrient intakecollaborative designconvolutional neural networkdeep learningdepth imagingfood classificationfood intakefood segmentationlong-term care

Identifiers

PMID36394940
PMCPMC9716425
OpenAlexW4290052953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.