Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394923›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2022

Usage of a Web-Based eHealth Intervention for Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: Mixed Methods Study.

Lotte Firet, Theodora Alberta Maria Teunissen, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Kim Josephina Bernadette Notten, Antoinette Leonarda Maria Lagro-Janssen, Huub van der Vaart, Willem Jan Jozef Assendelft

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lotte FiretDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9451-1482
Theodora Alberta Maria TeunissenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8510-3890
Rudolf Bertijn KoolIQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3134-487X
Kim Josephina Bernadette NottenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9107-4974
Antoinette Leonarda Maria Lagro-JanssenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2339-3743
Huub van der VaartDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0890-5368
Willem Jan Jozef AssendelftDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2966-3778
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is highly prevalent among women and has an impact on physical and mental well-being. eHealth with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) has shown to be effective in reducing complaints. The usage and nonusage attrition of eHealth for SUI is unknown, but knowledge about users and their usage patterns is crucial for implementation purposes.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate how an eHealth intervention for SUI was used and by whom, explore reasons for nonusage attrition, and determine what factors are associated with usage.

methodsIn this observational, mixed methods study, women with SUI independently registered to a web-based eHealth intervention, Baas over je blaas, a translation of the Swedish internet program Tät-treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Log-in data were collected during 3-month access to the website, and surveys were sent at baseline. Participants were divided into three user groups (low, intermediate, and high) and were compared based on sociodemographic and incontinence-related characteristics. Nominal logistic regression analysis was used to study factors associated with eHealth usage. Qualitative content analysis was used for open-ended questions about nonusage attrition and about facilitators of and barriers to eHealth usage.

resultsParticipants (n=561) had a mean age of 50.3 (SD 12.1) years, and most of them (340/553, 61.5%) had never visited a health care professional for SUI before. Most users were low users (295/515, 57.3%), followed by intermediate users (133/515, 25.8%) and high users (87/515, 16.9%). User groups differed significantly in age (48.3, SD 12 years; 52.1, SD 11.6 years; and 55.3, SD 10.9 years; P<.001) and in their expected ability to train the pelvic floor muscles (7.5, SD 1.4; 7.7, SD 1.4; and 8.1, SD 1.5 for low, intermediate, and high users, respectively; P=.006). Nonusage attrition was mainly caused by problems in integrating PFMT into everyday life. High age (>50 years), previous PFMT, and high expected ability to train the pelvic floor muscles are associated with high usage. Facilitators for eHealth usage were the clear explanation of exercises and the possibility of self-management. Barriers were its noncommittal character and the absence of personal contact.

conclusionseHealth fulfills a need for women with SUI who have never received treatment. Those who discontinued prematurely did so mainly because it was difficult to integrate the training schedule into their everyday lives. High eHealth usage was more likely for women aged >50 years, with previous PFMT, and with high expectations about their ability to train the pelvic floor muscles. Knowledge of these user characteristics can guide clinicians and correct their misunderstandings about the suitable target population for this intervention. Furthermore, strategies for reinforcing expectations and self-efficacy are important to upscale eHealth usage, together with paying attention to people's need for personal contact. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/13164.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionTelemedicineUrinary Incontinence, StressExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic FlooradherenceeHealthimplementation sciencemixed methods designnonattritionpelvic floor muscle trainingurinary incontinenceusagewomen

Identifiers

PMID36394923
PMCPMC9716423
OpenAlexW4297405116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.