Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394850›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2022

Machine Learning-Assisted Carbon Dot Synthesis: Prediction of Emission Color and Wavelength.

Ravithree D Senanayake, Xiaoxiao Yao, Clarice E Froehlich, Meghan S Cahill, Trever R Sheldon, Mary McIntire, Christy L Haynes, Rigoberto Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structure and Zeta Potential of Gold Nanoparticles with Coronas of Varying Size and Composition.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ravithree D SenanayakeDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4727-0521
Xiaoxiao YaoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7999-2898
Clarice E FroehlichDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8862-785X
Meghan S CahillDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1514-7625
Trever R SheldonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4851-6204
Mary McIntireDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1124-5970
Christy L HaynesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 207 Pleasant Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5420-5867
Rigoberto HernandezDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8526-7414

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon dots (CDs) have attracted great attention in a range of applications due to their bright photoluminescence, high photostability, and good biocompatibility. However, it is challenging to design CDs with specific emission properties because the syntheses involve many parameters, and it is not clear how each parameter influences the CD properties. To help bridge this gap, machine learning, specifically an artificial neural network, is employed in this work to characterize the impact of synthesis parameters on and make predictions for the emission color and wavelength for CDs. The machine reveals that the choice of reaction method, purification method, and solvent relate more closely to CD emission characteristics than the reaction temperature or time, which are frequently tuned in experiments. After considering multiple models, the best performing machine learning classification model achieved an accuracy of 94% in predicting relative to actual color. In addition, hybrid (two-stage) models incorporating both color classification and an artificial neural network

Indexed as

CarbonQuantum DotsMachine LearningSolventsTemperatureCarbonSolvents

Identifiers

PMID36394850
PMCPMC9749762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.