Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394797›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023

Keyword-augmented and semi-automatic generation of FESS reports: a proof-of-concept study.

V Kunz, V Wildfeuer, R Bieck, M Sorge, V Zebralla, A Dietz, T Neumuth, M Pirlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

V Kunz *Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Viktor.Kunz@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2415-7841
V Wildfeuer *Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
R BieckInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
M SorgeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
V ZebrallaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
A DietzDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
T NeumuthInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
M PirlichDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical reports are usually written after a procedure and must often be reproduced from memory. Thus, this is an error-prone, and time-consuming task which increases the workload of physicians. In this proof-of-concept study, we developed and evaluated a software tool using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for semi-automatic intraoperative generation of surgical reports for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). MATERIALS AND

methodsA vocabulary of keywords for developing a neural language model was created. With an encoder-decoder-architecture, artificially coherent sentence structures, as they would be expected in general operation reports, were generated. A first set of 48 conventional operation reports were used for model training. After training, the reports were generated again and compared to those before training. Established metrics were used to measure optimization of the model objectively. A cohort of 16 physicians corrected and evaluated three randomly selected, generated reports in four categories: "quality of the generated operation reports," "time-saving," "clinical benefits" and "comparison with the conventional reports." The corrections of the generated reports were counted and categorized.

resultsObjective parameters showed improvement in performance after training the language model (p < 0.001). 27.78% estimated a timesaving of 1-15 and 61.11% of 16-30 min per day. 66.66% claimed to see a clinical benefit and 61.11% a relevant workload reduction. Similarity in content between generated and conventional reports was seen by 33.33%, similarity in form by 27.78%. 66.67% would use this tool in the future. An average of 23.25 ± 12.5 corrections was needed for a subjectively appropriate surgery report.

conclusionThe results indicate existing limitations of applying deep learning to text generation of operation reports and show a high acceptance by the physicians. By taking over this time-consuming task, the tool could reduce workload, optimize clinical workflows and improve the quality of patient care. Further training of the language model is needed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSoftwareHumansWorkloadArtificial intelligenceDeep learningFESSNatural language processingNeural language modelsSurgical reports

Identifiers

PMID36394797
PMCPMC10113317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.