ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2023
Pooled evidence from preclinical and clinical studies for stem cell-based therapy in ARDS and COVID-19.
Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Nurse managers' experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A qualitative study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Key Role of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Interaction with Macrophages in Promoting Repair of Lung Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
COVID-19 has severely devastated many lives across the globe. It has been speculated that stem cell-based therapy for COVID-19 treatment could be able to subsidize the effects. In preclinical and clinical studies, stem cell-based therapy has successfully eliminated inflammatory cytokines in ALI, ARDS, and COVID-19. Clinical trials have produced a variety of promising results for validating stem cell therapy in COVID-19 patients. For instance, exosome-based therapy (ExoFlow) showed an 87% survival status, and MSC-based therapy (Mesoblast) achieved an 83% survival rate in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. This review debates the advantages of cell-free therapy, i.e., stem cell-derived exosome-based therapies, over stem cell-based therapy. This review aims to question whether the immunomodulatory effect of stem cells differs based on their origin and also tries to find possible answers for the best stem cells for treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. The role of stem cells and their extracellular vesicles in the upregulation of regulatory immune cells, growth factors (EGF, FGF, VEGF), and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, INF-α, galectin-1, notch-1, PDL-1) that promote the tissue regeneration at the injured site. The right side of the image depicts the downregulation of inflammation-inducing immune cells, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and chemokines that could also enhance COVID-19 therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.