Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394776›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2022

Comprehensive evaluation of end-point free energy techniques in carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host-guest binding: II. regression and dielectric constant.

Xiao Liu, Lei Zheng, Yalong Cong, Zhihao Gong, Zhixiang Yin, John Z H Zhang, Zhirong Liu, Zhaoxi Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Host Dynamics under General-Purpose Force Fields.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiao LiuSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China. liuxiaode2013@163.com.
Lei ZhengNYU-ECNU Center for Computational Chemistry at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Yalong CongSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Zhihao GongSchool of Micro-Nano Electronics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Zhixiang YinSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China.
John Z H ZhangNYU-ECNU Center for Computational Chemistry at NYU Shanghai, Shanghai, 200062, China. john.zhang@nyu.edu.
Zhirong LiuCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Zhaoxi SunCollege of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China. z.sun@pku.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-point free energy calculations as a powerful tool have been widely applied in protein-ligand and protein-protein interactions. It is often recognized that these end-point techniques serve as an option of intermediate accuracy and computational cost compared with more rigorous statistical mechanic models (e.g., alchemical transformation) and coarser molecular docking. However, it is observed that this intermediate level of accuracy does not hold in relatively simple and prototypical host-guest systems. Specifically, in our previous work investigating a set of carboxylated-pillar[6]arene host-guest complexes, end-point methods provide free energy estimates deviating significantly from the experimental reference, and the rank of binding affinities is also incorrectly computed. These observations suggest the unsuitability and inapplicability of standard end-point free energy techniques in host-guest systems, and alteration and development are required to make them practically usable. In this work, we consider two ways to improve the performance of end-point techniques. The first one is the PBSA_E regression that varies the weights of different free energy terms in the end-point calculation procedure, while the second one is considering the interior dielectric constant as an additional variable in the end-point equation. By detailed investigation of the calculation procedure and the simulation outcome, we prove that these two treatments (i.e., regression and dielectric constant) are manipulating the end-point equation in a somehow similar way, i.e., weakening the electrostatic contribution and strengthening the non-polar terms, although there are still many detailed differences between these two methods. With the trained end-point scheme, the RMSE of the computed affinities is improved from the standard ~ 12 kcal/mol to ~ 2.4 kcal/mol, which is comparable to another altered end-point method (ELIE) trained with system-specific data. By tuning PBSA_E weighting factors with the host-specific data, it is possible to further decrease the prediction error to ~ 2.1 kcal/mol. These observations along with the extremely efficient optimized-structure computation procedure suggest the regression (i.e., PBSA_E as well as its GBSA_E extension) as a practically applicable solution that brings end-point methods back into the library of usable tools for host-guest binding. However, the dielectric-constant-variable scheme cannot effectively minimize the experiment-calculation discrepancy for absolute binding affinities, but is able to improve the calculation of affinity ranks. This phenomenon is somehow different from the protein-ligand case and suggests the difference between host-guest and biomacromolecular (protein-ligand and protein-protein) systems. Therefore, the spectrum of tools usable for protein-ligand complexes could be unsuitable for host-guest binding, and numerical validations are necessary to screen out really workable solutions in these 'prototypical' situations.

Indexed as

Carboxylic AcidsProteinsEntropyLigandsMolecular Docking SimulationQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsCarboxylic AcidsLigandspillar(6)areneProteinsQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsDielectric constantEnd-point free energy methodsHost–guest bindingPillar[n]arenesRegression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.