Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394714›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2023

Treatment with Cladribine Tablets Beyond Year 4: A Position Statement by Southeast European Multiple Sclerosis Centers.

Mario Habek, Jelena Drulovic, Gregor Brecl Jakob, Ivan Barbov, Ljiljana Radulovic, Cecilia Rajda, Konrad Rejdak, Peter Turčáni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Switching from anti-CD20 therapies to cladribine and vice versa - Analysis of a German relapsing multiple sclerosis cohort.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  6. Cladribine tablets in the new multiple sclerosis era.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Mario HabekDepartment of Neurology, Referral Center for Autonomic Nervous System Disorders, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. mhabek@mef.hr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-1748
Jelena DrulovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Gregor Brecl JakobDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivan BarbovUniversity Clinic for Neurology Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Ljiljana RadulovicDepartment of Neurology, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Cecilia RajdaDepartment of Neurology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-4778
Konrad RejdakDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Peter Turčáni1St Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Comenius University Bratislava · SKLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIMedical University of Lublin · PLPHI University Psychiatric Clinic - Skopje · MKUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Montenegro · MEUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the results of the pivotal CLARITY study, cladribine tablets were approved for use in the European Union in 2017 as a high-efficacy therapy for highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Cladribine tablets are used as an induction therapy: half of the total dose is given in year 1 and the other half in year 2. In the CLARITY Extension trials, repeating the dose routinely in years 3 and 4, was not associated with significantly improved disease control. However, there is very limited evidence on how to manage people with MS (pwMS) beyond year 4, which is increasingly important because more and more patients are now ≥ 4 years after cladribine treatment. Overall, postapproval data show that treatment with two cladribine cycles effectively controls disease activity in the long term. However, there is general agreement that some pwMS with suboptimal response could benefit from retreatment. This study reviews the practical aspects of using cladribine tablets, summarizes the evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies on the safety and efficacy of cladribine, and proposes a treatment algorithm developed by expert consensus for pwMS previously treated with cladribine. In brief, we propose that additional courses of cladribine tablets should be considered in patients with minimal (no relapses, 1-2 new lesions) or moderate (1 relapse, 3-4 new lesions) disease activity, while significant disease activity (> 1 relapse, > 3 new lesions) or progression should warrant a switch to another high-efficacy treatment (HET). More evidence is needed to improve the treatment guidelines for pwMS who previously received cladribine.

Indexed as

Cladribine tabletsMultiple sclerosisRecommendationsRetreatment

Identifiers

PMID36394714
PMCPMC9672547
OpenAlexW4309516460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.