Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394673›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2022

Clinical outcome of wild-type AmpC-producing Enterobacterales infection in critically ill patients treated with β-lactams: a prospective multicenter study.

Roman Mounier, Ronan Le Guen, Paul-Louis Woerther, Mathieu Nacher, Clément Bonnefon, Nicolas Mongardon, Olivier Langeron, Eric Levesque, Séverine Couffin, Stéphanie Houcke and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Wild-Type AmpC Beta-Lactamase-ProducingDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Roman MounierDépartement de Neuro-Anesthésie-Réanimation, GHU-Paris, Université de Paris, 1, Rue Cabanis, 75014, Paris, France. roman.mounier@laposte.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3447-7021
Ronan Le GuenDépartement de Microbiologie, Hopitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, Créteil, France.
Paul-Louis WoertherDépartement de Microbiologie, Hopitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, Créteil, France.
Mathieu NacherCentre d'investigation Clinique, Antilles-Guyane (CIC INSERM 1424, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane Française, France.
Clément BonnefonDépartement de Neuro-Anesthésie-Réanimation, GHU-Paris, Université de Paris, 1, Rue Cabanis, 75014, Paris, France.
Nicolas MongardonService d'anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, DMU CARE, DHU A-TVB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010, Créteil, France.
Olivier LangeronService d'anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, DMU CARE, DHU A-TVB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010, Créteil, France.
Eric LevesqueService d'anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, DMU CARE, DHU A-TVB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010, Créteil, France.
Séverine CouffinDépartement d'Anesthesie, Hospital Mignot, Versailles, France.
Stéphanie HouckeRéanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane Française, France.
Michel WolffDépartement de Neuro-Anesthésie-Réanimation, GHU-Paris, Université de Paris, 1, Rue Cabanis, 75014, Paris, France.
Ariane RoujanskyRéanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane Française, France.
Caroline SchimpfDépartement de Neuro-Anesthésie-Réanimation, GHU-Paris, Université de Paris, 1, Rue Cabanis, 75014, Paris, France.
Armand Mekontso DessapService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, 94010, Créteil, France.
Fabrice CookRéanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane Française, France.
Keyvan RazaziService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, 94010, Créteil, France.
Hatem KallelRéanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Cayenne, Cayenne, Guyane Française, France.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital André Mignot · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundβ-lactams are the main antibiotics used against wild-type AmpC-producing Enterobacterales (wtAE). However, they may fail or select AmpC-overproducing mutants. Our aim was to assess factors associated with clinical failure of β-lactams in the treatment of wtAE infection.

methodsFrom September 2017 to December 2020, we prospectively included all consecutive patients treated by definitive β-lactams therapy for wtAE infection in four university ICUs. Clinical failure was defined as inadequate response to antimicrobial therapy leading to death or to the switch for a broader-spectrum antibiotic.

results177 patients were included and 29.4% progressed to clinical failure. E. cloacae was the most prevalent species (42.4%) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was the most frequent wtAE infection (69.5%). Cefepime and cefotaxime were used as definitive antibiotic treatment in 42.9% and 27.7% of patients, respectively. Occurrence of AmpC-overproduction was documented in 5.6% of patients and was associated with clinical failure (p = 0.004). In multivariate analysis, VAP (p < 0.001, OR 11.58 [95% CI 3.11-43.02] and K. aerogenes (p = 0.030, OR 3.76 [95% CI 1.13-12.46]) were independently associated with clinical failure. Conversely, cefotaxime as definitive treatment was found inversely associated with the risk of clinical failure (p = 0.022, OR 0.25 [95% CI 0.08-0.82]). After inverse probability weighting, cefotaxime showed a 20% risk reduction of clinical failure (95% CI  5-35%, p = 0.007) whatever the location of infection, the SOFA score on the day of wtAE infection, or the bacterial species.

conclusionsClinical failure in the treatment of wtAE infections is associated with the infection site and the causal microorganism. Additionally, cefotaxime use is probably protective against clinical failure in wtAE infection.

Indexed as

AmpC-producing EnterobacteralesAmpC β-lactamasesICUInfectionThird-generation cephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID36394673
PMCPMC9672193
OpenAlexW4309179878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.