Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394657›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2023

Mice make temporal inferences about novel locations based on previously learned spatiotemporal contingencies.

Ezgi Gür, Yalçın A Duyan, Fuat Balcı

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ezgi GürDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, 50 Sifton Road, Room 222, Winnipeg, R3T 2M5, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-2446
Yalçın A DuyanDepartment of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-0165
Fuat BalcıDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Manitoba, 50 Sifton Road, Room 222, Winnipeg, R3T 2M5, Canada. fuat.balci@umanitoba.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3390-9352

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu 117K370Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu BİDEB-2211E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals learn multiple spatiotemporal contingencies and organize their anticipatory responses accordingly. The representational/computational capacity that underlies such spatiotemporally guided behaviors is not fully understood. To this end, we investigated whether mice make temporal inferences of novel locations based on previously learned spatiotemporal contingencies. We trained 18 C57BL/6J mice to anticipate reward after three different intervals at three different locations and tested their temporal expectations of a reward at five locations simultaneously, including two locations that were not previously associated with reward delivery but adjacent to the previously trained locations. If mice made spatiotemporal inferences, they were expected to interpolate between duration pairs associated with previously reinforced hoppers surrounding the novel hopper. We found that the maximal response rate at the novel locations indeed fell between the two intervals reinforced at the surrounding hoppers. We argue that this pattern of responding might be underlain by spatially constrained Bayesian computations.

Indexed as

LearningRewardAnimalsBayes TheoremMiceMice, Inbred C57BLBayesian averagingConditioningInterval timingMicePeak interval procedure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.