ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2023
Brief report: STING expressed in tumor and non-tumor compartments has distinct roles in regulating anti-tumor immunity.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- C92, a proton channel-blocking allosteric STING agonist generates robust antitumor activity.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Demystifying the cGAS-STING pathway: precision regulation in the tumor immune microenvironment.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Oral ENPP1 inhibitor designed using generative AI as next generation STING modulator for solid tumors.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Improved Tumor Blood Flow Enhances the Abscopal Effect: Preclinical Assessment in Mice Treated with Combined Radiation and PD-1 Blockade Therapy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- STING Agonists and How to Reach Their Full Potential in Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- VAX014 Activates Tumor-Intrinsic STING and RIG-I to Promote the Development of Antitumor Immunity.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
- N-MYC impairs innate immune signaling in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.Science advances · 2024Article
- Differential Regulation of the STING Pathway in Human Papillomavirus-Positive and -Negative Head and Neck Cancers.Cancer research communications · 2024Article
- The Role of STING-Mediated Activation of Dendritic Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- The common H232 STING allele shows impaired activities in DNA sensing, susceptibility to viral infection, and in monocyte cell function, while the HAQ variant possesses wild-type properties.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Functional tumor cell-intrinsic STING, not host STING, drives local and systemic antitumor immunity and therapy efficacy following cryoablation.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Article
- Targeting cGAS/STING signaling-mediated myeloid immune cell dysfunction in TIME.Journal of biomedical science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type I interferon-mediated activation of immune cells can facilitate the generation of productive tumor antigen-specific T cell responses in solid tumors. The cGAS/STING DNA sensing pathway is a critical upstream mediator of type I interferon production and is an important regulator of anti-tumor immunity. Numerous STING pathway agonists are now being tested in clinical trials, but the effectiveness of this approach is not yet clear and a better understanding of the relative importance of this pathway in various tumor settings is needed. We have evaluated syngeneic tumor models with different baseline inflammatory states to determine the contributions of STING activity in both tumor and non-tumor cellular compartments to anti-tumor immune responses. We find that productive anti-tumor immune responses in the poorly immunogenic B16F10 model show a strong dependence on STING expression in non-tumor cells. In the immunogenic MC38 model, constitutive STING activation in tumor cells can partially bypass the requirement for STING-dependent activity from immune cells. Our findings reveal multiple, context-dependent roles for STING activity in the regulation of anti-tumor immunity and the response to immunotherapy. In preclinical models where STING is basally active, checkpoint inhibition is more likely to have a therapeutic effect and removal of STING signaling from either the tumor or the non-tumor compartment has a minimal effect. Removal of STING signaling in both, however, diminishes the efficacy derived from checkpoint therapy. Further work is needed to understand the heterogeneity of STING signaling in patients, both in tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment, and the best means of harnessing this pathway to generate anti-tumor immunity and improve therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.