Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394633›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2022

Exchanging Replicas with Unequal Cost, Infinitely and Permanently.

Sander Roet, Daniel T Zhang, Titus S van Erp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. NaCl Dissociation Explored Through Predictive Power Path Sampling Analysis.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  3. Highly parallelizable path sampling with minimal rejections using asynchronous replica exchange and infinite swaps.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sander RoetDepartment of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0732-545X
Daniel T ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491Trondheim, Norway.
Titus S van ErpDepartment of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6600-6657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a replica exchange method that is effectively parallelizable even if the computational cost of the Monte Carlo moves in the parallel replicas are considerably different, for instance, because the replicas run on different types of processor units or because of the algorithmic complexity. To prove detailed-balance, we make a paradigm shift from the common conceptual viewpoint in which the set of parallel replicas represents a high-dimensional superstate, to an ensemble-based criterion in which the other ensembles represent an environment that might or might not participate in the Monte Carlo move. In addition, based on a recent algorithm for computing permanents, we effectively increase the exchange rate to infinite without the steep factorial scaling as a function of the number of replicas. We illustrate the effectiveness of this replica exchange methodology by combining it with a quantitative path sampling method, replica exchange transition interface sampling (RETIS), in which the costs for a Monte Carlo move can vary enormously as paths in a RETIS algorithm do not have the same length and the average path lengths tend to vary considerably for the different path ensembles that run in parallel. This combination, coined ∞RETIS, was tested on three model systems.

Identifiers

PMID36394633
PMCPMC9720720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.