Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394265›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

rGREAT: an R/bioconductor package for functional enrichment on genomic regions.

Zuguang Gu, Daniel Hübschmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Modular genetic architecture underlies human hand and foot evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zuguang GuMolecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg 69120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7395-8709
Daniel HübschmannMolecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg 69120, Germany.

Funding

National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Molecular Precision Oncology Program.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryGREAT (Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool) is a widely used tool for functional enrichment on genomic regions. However, as an online tool, it has limitations of outdated annotation data, small numbers of supported organisms and gene set collections, and not being extensible for users. Here, we developed a new R/Bioconductorpackage named rGREAT which implements the GREAT algorithm locally. rGREAT by default supports more than 600 organisms and a large number of gene set collections, as well as self-provided gene sets and organisms from users. Additionally, it implements a general method for dealing with background regions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The package rGREAT is freely available from the Bioconductor project: https://bioconductor.org/packages/rGREAT/. The development version is available at https://github.com/jokergoo/rGREAT. Gene Ontology gene sets for more than 600 organisms retrieved from Ensembl BioMart are presented in an R package BioMartGOGeneSets which is available at https://github.com/jokergoo/BioMartGOGeneSets. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

GenomicsSoftwareAlgorithmsGene OntologyGenome

Identifiers

PMID36394265
PMCPMC9805586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.