ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023
Epidemic Question Answering: question generation and entailment for Answer Nugget discovery.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Question answering systems for health professionals at the point of care-a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe rapidly growing body of communications during the COVID-19 pandemic posed a challenge to information seekers, who struggled to find answers to their specific and changing information needs. We designed a Question Answering (QA) system capable of answering ad-hoc questions about the COVID-19 disease, its causal virus SARS-CoV-2, and the recommended response to the pandemic. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe QA system incorporates, in addition to relevance models, automatic generation of questions from relevant sentences. We relied on entailment between questions for (1) pinpointing answers and (2) selecting novel answers early in the list of its results.
resultsThe QA system produced state-of-the-art results when processing questions asked by experts (eg, researchers, scientists, or clinicians) and competitive results when processing questions asked by consumers of health information. Although state-of-the-art models for question generation and question entailment were used, more than half of the answers were missed, due to the limitations of the relevance models employed. DISCUSSION: Although question entailment enabled by automatic question generation is the cornerstone of our QA system's architecture, question entailment did not prove to always be reliable or sufficient in ranking the answers. Question entailment should be enhanced with additional inferential capabilities.
conclusionThe QA system presented in this article produced state-of-the-art results processing expert questions and competitive results processing consumer questions. Improvements should be considered by using better relevance models and enhanced inference methods. Moreover, experts and consumers have different answer expectations, which should be accounted for in future QA development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.