Trial reportCancer medicine2023
Novel prognostic nomograms in cervical cancer based on analysis of 1075 patients.
Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel prognostic nomograms in cervical cancer based on analysis of 1075 patients.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Nomograms for predicting survival of elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a secondary analysis of the CCTG CE.6 trial.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Nomogram model for predicting the long-term prognosis of cervical cancer patients: a population-based study in Mato Grosso, Brazil.BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the factors affecting the prognosis of cervical cancer (CC), and to construct and evaluate predictive nomograms to guide individualized clinical treatment.
methodsThe clinicopathological and follow-up data of CC patients from June 2013 to December 2019 in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively analyzed. Log-rank test was used for univariate survival analysis, and Cox multivariate regression was used to identify independent prognostic factors, based on which nomogram models were established and evaluated in multiple aspects.
resultsPatients were randomly assigned into the training (n = 746) and validation sets (n = 329). Survival analysis of the training set identified cervical myometrial invasion, parametrial involvement, and malignant tumor history as prognosticators of postoperative DFS and pathological type, cervical myometrial invasion, and history of STD for OS. C-index was 0.799 and 0.839 for the nomograms for DFS and OS, respectively. Calibration curves and Brier scores also indicated high performance. Importantly, decision curve analysis suggested great clinical applicability of these nomograms.
conclusionsIn this study, we analyzed a cohort of 1075 CC patients and identified DFS- or OS-associated clinicohistologic characteristics. Two nomograms were subsequently constructed for DFS and OS prognostication, respectively, and showed high performance in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability. These models may facilitate individualized treatment and patient selection for clinical trials. Future investigations with larger cohorts and prospective designs are warranted for validating these prognostic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.