Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36394153›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

PK/PD model-informed dose selection for oncology phase I expansion: Case study based on PF-06939999, a PRMT5 inhibitor.

Cen Guo, Kai H Liao, Meng Li, I-Ming Wang, Naveed Shaik, Donghua Yin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03854227 (A PHASE 1 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ESCALATING DOSES OF PF-06939999), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03854227 phase1terminatednot on this map

A phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of escalating doses of pf-06939999 (prmt5 inhibitor) in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal cancer, endometrial cancer, cervical cancer and bladder cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2019 to 2022Enrolled54ConditionsAdvanced Solid Tumors, Metastatic Solid TumorsArmsPF-06939999 dose escalation, PF-06939999 monotherapy, PF-06939999 in combination with docetaxel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeting RNA splicing modulation: new perspectives for anticancer strategy?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  7. Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cen GuoPfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6850-1045
Kai H LiaoPfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2448-3663
Meng LiPfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
I-Ming WangPfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Naveed ShaikPfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2862-7089
Donghua YinPfizer Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal dose for targeted oncology therapeutics is often not the maximum tolerated dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling can be an effective tool to integrate clinical data to help identify the optimal dose. This case study shows the utility of population PK/PD modeling in selecting the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) for the first-in-patient (FIP) study of PF-06939999, a small-molecule inhibitor of protein arginine methyltransferase 5. In the dose escalation part of the FIP trial (NCT03854227), 28 patients with solid tumors were administered PF-06939999 at 0.5 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, or 8 mg once daily (q.d.) or 0.5 mg, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, or 6 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Tolerability, safety, PK, PD biomarkers (plasma symmetrical dimethyl-arginine [SDMA]), and antitumor response were assessed. Semimechanistic population PK/PD modeling analyses were performed to characterize the time-courses of plasma PF-06939999 concentrations, plasma SDMA, and platelet counts collected from 28 patients. Platelet counts were evaluated because thrombocytopenia was the treatment-related adverse event with clinical safety concern. The models adequately described the PK, SDMA, and platelet count profiles both at individual and population levels. Simulations suggested that among a range of dose levels, 6 mg q.d. would yield the optimal balance between achieving the PD target (i.e., 78% reduction in plasma SDMA) and staying below an acceptable probability of developing grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. As a result, 6 mg q.d. was selected as the RDE. The model-informed drug development approach informed the rational dose selection for the early clinical development of PF-06939999.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsThrombocytopeniaBiomarkersEnzyme InhibitorsHumansPlatelet CountProtein-Arginine N-MethyltransferasesBiomarkersEnzyme InhibitorsPRMT5 protein, humanProtein-Arginine N-Methyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID36394153
PMCPMC10681508
OpenAlexW4309246758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.