ArticleNature machine intelligence2022
A teachable moment for dual-use.
Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A framework for evaluating the chemical knowledge and reasoning abilities of large language models against the expertise of chemists.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
- Disruptive Technologies and Open Science: How Open Should Open Science Be? A 'Third Bioethics' Ethical Framework.Science and engineering ethics · 2024Article
- Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools.Nature machine intelligence · 2024Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Protein Design Must Consider Repurposing Potential.GEN biotechnology · 2023Article
- Comparing LDJournal of chemical health & safety · 2023Article
- Validation of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition Machine Learning Models for Multiple Species.Chemical research in toxicology · 2023Article
- Preventing AI From Creating Biochemical Threats.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- AI in drug discovery: A wake-up call.Drug discovery today · 2023Article
- Assessing emerging technologies from an arms control perspective.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.