Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36393919›Full record

ReviewStem cell investigation2022

Adverse events, side effects and complications in mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies.

Denis S Baranovskii, Ilya D Klabukov, Nadezhda V Arguchinskaya, Anna O Yakimova, Anastas A Kisel, Elena M Yatsenko, Sergei A Ivanov, Peter V Shegay, Andrey D Kaprin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell investigation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Critical Systematic Review of 3D Bioprinting in Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Denis S BaranovskiiNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Ilya D KlabukovNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Nadezhda V ArguchinskayaNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Anna O YakimovaNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Anastas A KiselNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Elena M YatsenkoNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Sergei A IvanovNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Peter V ShegayNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.
Andrey D KaprinNational Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Obninsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous clinical studies have shown a wide clinical potential of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) application. However, recent experience has accumulated numerous reports of adverse events and side effects associated with MSCs therapy. Furthermore, the strategies and methods of MSCs therapy did not change significantly in recent decades despite the clinical impact and awareness of potential complications. An extended understanding of limitations could lead to a wider clinical implementation of safe cell therapies and avoid harmful approaches. Therefore, our objective was to summarize the possible negative effects observed during MSCs-based therapies. We were also aimed to discuss the risks caused by weaknesses in cell processing, including isolation, culturing, and storage. Cell processing and cell culture could dramatically influence cell population profile, change protein expression and cell differentiation paving the way for future negative effects. Long-term cell culture led to accumulation of chromosomal abnormalities. Overdosed antibiotics in culture media enhanced the risk of mycoplasma contamination. Clinical trials reported thromboembolism and fibrosis as the most common adverse events of MSCs therapy. Their delayed manifestation generally depends on the patient's individual phenotype and requires specific awareness during the clinical trials with obligatory inclusion in the patient' informed consents. Finally we prepared the safety checklist, recommended for clinical specialists before administration or planning of MSCs therapy.

Indexed as

Adverse eventscell therapycomplicationsmesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)side effects

Identifiers

PMID36393919
PMCPMC9659480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.