Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36393892›Full record

ReviewBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2022

Developing minimum core data structure for the obesity devices Coordinated Registry Network (CRN).

Cynthia Long, James E Tcheng, Danica Marinac-Dabic, Andrea Iorga, Mitchell Krucoff, Deborah Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cynthia LongCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1419-3395
James E TchengClinical Research Institute, Duke Univesity School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Danica Marinac-DabicCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Andrea IorgaCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7809-9184
Mitchell KrucoffClinical Research Institute, Duke Univesity School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Deborah FisherClinical Research Institute, Duke Univesity School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Clinical Research Institute · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

FDA HHS U01 FD005478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity continues to be a major public health issue, with more than two-thirds of adults in the USA categorized as overweight or obese. Bariatric surgery is effective and yields durable weight loss; however, few qualified candidates choose to undergo surgical treatment. Less-invasive alternatives to bariatric surgery are being developed to bridge the treatment gap. Recognizing the burden of conducting pivotal clinical trials and traditional post-approval studies for medical devices, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health has encouraged the development of real-world data content and quality that is sufficient to provide evidence for Total Product Life Cycle medical device evaluation. A key first step is to establish a minimum core data structure that provides a common lexicon for endoscopic obesity devices and its corresponding interoperable data elements. Such a structure would facilitate data capture across existing workflow with a 'coordinated registry network' capability. On July 29, 2016, a workshop entitled, 'GI Coordinated Registry Network: A Case for Obesity Devices' was held at the FDA White Oak Campus by the Medical Device Epidemiology Network public-private partnership and FDA to initiate the work of developing a common lexicon and core data elements in the metabolic device space, which marked the inauguration of the Gastrointestinal Coordinated Registry Network project. Several work groups were subsequently formed to address clinical issues, data quality issues, registry participation, and data sharing.

Indexed as

device approvaldevice evaluationdevice surveillancepatient outcome assessmentreal world evidence

Identifiers

PMID36393892
PMCPMC9660582
OpenAlexW4308994737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.