Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36389839›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Monocyte response after colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.

Pim P Edomskis, Willem A Dik, Cloë L Sparreboom, Nicole M A Nagtzaam, Adrie van Oudenaren, Daniël P V Lambrichts, Yves Bayon, Noah N N van Dongen, Anand G Menon, Eelco J R de Graaf and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pim P EdomskisLaboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Willem A DikDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Cloë L SparreboomDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Nicole M A NagtzaamDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Adrie van OudenarenDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Daniël P V LambrichtsDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Yves BayonMedtronic - Sofradim Production, Trevoux, France.
Noah N N van DongenUniversity of Amsterdam, Psychological Methods Group, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anand G MenonDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands.
Eelco J R de GraafDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands.
Peter Paul L O CoeneDepartment of Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Johan F LangeDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Pieter J M LeenenDepartment of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLMedtronic (France) · FRUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tumor resection is the common approach in patients with colorectal malignancy. Profound insight into inflammatory changes that accompany the normal post-operative stress response will establish reference parameters useful for identification of putative complications. Alterations in circulating monocytes might be indicative as these cells are considered to be the most responsive leukocytes to trauma. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the monocyte subset kinetic and phenotypic changes in response to surgery. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing colorectal tumor resection were included in a multicenter prospective cohort study. Blood samples were collected early in the morning prior to surgery and the next days through postoperative day three for flowcytometric analysis. Leukocyte subtypes were identified and expression of activation stage-related markers by monocyte subsets was quantified. Results: Changes in leukocyte subset composition and monocyte subset phenotypes were most prominent at the first day postoperatively, after which these parameters typically returned to normal or near-normal preoperative values. The immunophenotypic alterations after surgery were most notable in classical and intermediate monocytes. These included up-regulation of activation markers CD64 and CD62L, but down-regulation of HLA-DR and CD54. Markers of de-activation, CD163 and CD206, were consistently increasingly expressed. Discussion/conclusion: The current study gives detailed insight into the peripheral blood leukocyte response after colorectal cancer surgery. This form of short-term stress induces a rapid and significant redistribution of immune cells. Immunophenotypic alterations in monocytes as a response to surgery suggest a mixed profile of cellular activation and de-activation.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryMonocytesBiomarkersHLA-DR AntigensProspective StudiesReceptors, IgGBiomarkersHLA-DR AntigensReceptors, IgGcolorectal carcinomainflammatory responseleukocytemonocytesurgery

Identifiers

PMID36389839
PMCPMC9647000
OpenAlexW4307635088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.