SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2022
Emotion recognition and processing in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social cognition in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Pooled it
- Moral decision-making in real and sacrificial contexts: a pilot study on social cognition in mild cognitive impairment.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Detecting cognitive impairment and psychological well-being among older adults.Machine learning. Health · 2026Article
- Cognitive Testing in Spanish Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emotion recognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment: The role of face processing and emotional intelligence.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Mini-SEA: Validity and Normative Data for the French-Quebec Population Aged 50 Years and Above.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Article
- Empathy in mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary clinical comparative study in Southern Switzerland using the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) and the story-based empathy task (SET).Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- The Story behind the Mask: A Narrative Review on Hypomimia in Parkinson's Disease.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Age-related reduction in anxiety and neural encoding of negative emotional memory.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Eye-tracking paradigms for the assessment of mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Beyond walking: gait context and demands shape arousal and valence evoked by observation in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate emotion recognition and processing in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in order to update the state of current literature on this important but undervalued topic. We identified 15 papers published between 2012 and 2022 that meet the inclusion criteria. Paper search, selection, and extraction followed the PRISMA guidelines. We used a narrative synthesis approach in order to report a summary of the main findings taken from all papers. The results collected are still ambiguous: some studies did not find any differences between MCI and healthy controls (HC) groups in emotion recognition and processing, and other results reported emotion-specific deficits in emotion recognition regarding MCI patients (both regarding negative and neutral emotions). It is essential to underline that these findings could not be generalized to the whole MCI population due to the heterogeneous use of measures and composition of the sample. This does not allow us to make a comprehensive comparison between the results. Our suggestion for future research is to align the results using the same type of tests and emotion recognition assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.