ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Analysis of predictors of mortality and clinical outcomes of different subphenotypes for moderate-to-severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective single-center study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Independent predictors of long-term pulmonary function recovery in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Re-evaluating early high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in moderate-to-severe pediatric ARDS: evidence from a genetic matching analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Fatal Influenza B-MRSA Coinfection in a Healthy Adolescent: Necrotizing Pneumonia, Cytokine Storm, and Multi-Organ Failure.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk factors for mortality in children with moderate-to-severe ARDS with concurrent hematological or immune-related diseases: a retrospective analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Effects of rescue airway pressure release ventilation on mortality in severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective comparative analysis from India.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Editorial: Pediatric respiratory critical illness: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to observe the prognosis of patients with moderate-to-severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) as a function of underlying conditions and available treatment strategies, and to investigate the risk factors for death and the outcomes of different clinical subphenotypes. Methods: Patients were divided into non-survivors and survivors according to the prognosis 28 days after the diagnosis. The risk factors for death and the predictive value of relevant factors for mortality were analyzed. Latent class analysis was used to identify different clinical subphenotypes. Results: A total of 213 patients with moderate-to-severe PARDS were enrolled, of which 98 (46.0%) died. Higher PELOD2 scores (OR = 1.082, 95% CI 1.004-1.166, Conclusions: Moderate-to-severe PARDS has high morbidity and mortality in PICU; a higher PELOD2 score, greater organ failure, sepsis, any comorbidity, and higher IAG were risk factors for death, and the combination of these five indicators had the greatest value in predicting prognosis. More patients with sepsis, positive respiratory pathogens, higher PIM3 and PELOD2 scores, and higher IAG were in higher-risk phenotype group, which had worse outcomes. Clear classification facilitates targeted treatment and prognosis determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.