ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Effect of
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus MP108 on functional constipation symptoms and gut microbiota in children.Pediatric research · 2026Trial
- [Research status and prospects of probiotics in functional gastrointestinal disorders in infants and toddlers].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic constipation is common in children and often requires prolonged laxative treatment. Preliminary studies suggest that the probiotic Methods: A prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 5 pediatric departments in France between June 2017 and June 2021. In all, 49 patients-ages 6 months to 4 years, and suffering from chronic constipation per Rome IV criteria-were randomly allocated to the test and control groups. For 4 weeks, all were orally administered 5 daily drops of the test ( Results: The change in SBMs relative to baseline was greater in the control group at week 4 (control: 0.27 ± 0.5; test: 0.23 ± 0.5; Conclusion: This double-blind randomized controlled trial did not confirm the efficacy of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.