Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36389293›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Development and validation of a new prediction model for calcific aortic valve stenosis.

Jun-Yu Chen, Ming-Zhen Zhu, Tao Xiong, Zi-Yao Wang, Qing Chang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Yu Chen *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Ming-Zhen Zhu *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Tao XiongDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Zi-Yao WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Qing ChangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNQingdao University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is a common valvular heart disease, but there are limited reports on the construction of prediction models for CAVS. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for CAVS and construct a predictive model for CAVS based on its common clinical features. Methods: Patients with CAVS who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from 2016 to 2020 and those who underwent physical examination during the same period were retrospectively studied and placed in the CAVS group and normal group based on the area of aortic valve orifice less than or more than 3 cm Results: In this study, 11 independent predictors were distinguished by multivariate logistic regression analysis: history of hypertension, history of carotid atherosclerosis, age, diastolic blood pressure, C-reactive protein, direct bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], uric acid, and cystatin C. A nomogram was constructed using the above indicators. The model was well-calibrated and showed good discrimination and accuracy [the area under the curve (AUC) =0.981] in the training set, with a sensitivity of 91.89% and a specificity of 95.48%. More importantly, the nomogram displayed a good performance in the validation set (AUC =0.955, 95% CI: 0.925-0.985), with a sensitivity of 93.75% and a specificity of 84.09%. Additionally, DCA revealed that the nomogram had high clinical practicability. Conclusions: This study successfully established a risk prediction model for CAVS based on 11 conveniently accessible clinical indicators, which might easily be used for individualized risk assessment of CAVS.

Indexed as

aortic valve stenosisCalcificationnomogramprediction modelrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID36389293
PMCPMC9641316
OpenAlexW4307808650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.