ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2022
CMR findings in patients referred for suspected myocarditis following mRNA-based COVID vaccination compared with pre-COVID myocarditis referrals: A single-centre observational study.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment in the setting of chronic coronary occlusion.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025Article
- Recent highlights on myocarditis and cardiomyopathies from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaccination is considered the key to overcome the COVID pandemic. For the first time mRNA-based vaccinations are used in humans. Case series suggested an increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination. This study sought to describe CMR findings in patients with suspected mRNA-vaccine associated myocarditis. Methods: A total of 33 consecutive patients referred for CMR work-up of suspected myocarditis associated with mRNA-based vaccination were included. A historical cohort of 135 consecutive patients referred for suspected myocarditis in the pre-COVID era served as control group. All patients underwent multi-parametric CMR including CINE and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging as well as parametric T1/T2 mapping of the left ventricular myocardium. Results: Patients referred for suspected vaccination-related myocarditis were more often female (55 % vs 32 %, p = 0.015) and demonstrated smaller LV dimensions as well as a better LV function compared to patients of the control group. CMR revealed a lower prevalence of non-ischemic LGE in patients with suspected vaccination-myocarditis (6 % vs 22 %, p = 0.04). However, among patients without LGE we observed a higher prevalence of an abnormal T1/T2 mapping result in patients with suspected vaccination-myocarditis compared to the control group (45 % vs 18 %, p = 0.010). Conclusion: In this small single-centre study, compared to myocarditis referrals in the pre-COVID era, patients currently referred for CMR work-up of suspected mRNA-vaccination-associated myocarditis demonstrated lower prevalence of LGE but higher prevalence of abnormal T1/T2 mapping. These hypothesis-generating observations may point towards a rather subtle myocardial damage and support the routine use of T1/T2 mapping in this indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.