ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Effects of low-dose aspirin and heparin on the pregnancy outcome in women with antiphospholipid syndrome.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnancy: a comprehensive literature review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Review
- Prevention of preeclampsia by aspirin consumption in high-risk pregnancies that can be complicated with preeclampsia: A systematic review.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025Review
- Understanding the Pathophysiology of Preeclampsia: Exploring the Role of Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes of low-dose aspirin plus low-molecular-weight heparin therapy on antiphospholipid antibody-positive pregnant women with chronic hypertension.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the use of low-dose aspirin alone versus prednisone and low-dose aspirin versus heparin and low-dose aspirin in the treatment of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome in pregnant women. Study design: A prospective, single-center randomized trial included 14 patients who were alternately assigned to treatment. Each patient had a history of recurrent miscarriage diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome. 5 accepted the treatment of aspirin alone, 5 accepted the combination treatment of aspirin + prednisone, and 4 accepted the combination therapy of aspirin + heparin. Data were compared by the One-way ANOVA test using IBM SPSS stats 19. Results: There were no significant differences in patient outcome data, obstetric complications, and gestational age at delivery in live births between the 3 groups (P > 0.05). However, treatment with aspirin + heparin increased neonatal weight (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the non-superiority one on each other of the three different regimens, except in terms of neonatal weight when aspirin + heparin were used. These findings raise questions about the need for therapies such as heparin and corticosteroids for women with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, especially in resource-limited settings similar to Syria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.