ArticleiScience2022
Multiple high-regional-incidence cardiac disease diagnosis with deep learning and its potential to elevate cardiologist performance.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Foundation model of ECG diagnosis: Diagnostics and explanations of any form and rhythm on ECG.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, due to lack of large-scale datasets containing multiple arrhythmias and acute coronary syndrome-related diseases, AI-aided diagnosis for cardiac diseases is limited in clinical scenarios. Whether AI-based ECG diagnosis can assist cardiologists to improve performance has not been reported. We constructed a large-scale dataset containing multiple high-regional-incidence arrhythmias and ACS-related diseases, including 162,622 12-lead ECGs collected between January 2018 and March 2021. We presented a deep learning model for clinical ECG diagnosis of multiple cardiac diseases. Results show that our model for diagnosing 15 cardiac abnormalities achieved 88.216% accuracy, and its average AUC ROC score reached 0.961. On the board-certified re-annotated dataset, its performance surpasses that of cardiologists in non-reference group. Moreover, with aid of labels given by our model, accuracy and efficiency for cardiologist increased by 13.5% and 69.9% than non-reference group. Our approach provides solutions for AI-aided diagnosis systems of cardiac diseases in applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.